Suppr超能文献

健康个体站立和坐姿下记录姿势控制的测量方法比较。

Comparison of Measurements for Recording Postural Control in Standing and Seated Position in Healthy Individuals.

作者信息

Floessel Philipp, Hammerschmidt Franziska, Koltermann Jan Jens, Foerster Justin, Beck Heidrun, Disch Alexander Carl, Datzmann Thomas

机构信息

University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma & Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Consulting Engineer for Metrology and Data Science, Bahnhofstraße 33, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 27;9(4):178. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040178.

Abstract

: A standard method of assessing postural control is to measure while standing. However, its implementation is usually limited. Recording postural control directly on the trunk in a seated position could provide an alternative diagnostic method for quantifying neuromuscular control. : A comparison of center of pressure (CoP) measurements in the standing and sitting positions was performed on 66 healthy adult subjects. The reliability of the measurements in the sitting position was tested in 23 subjects. In addition, the extension force of all test subjects was recorded. : The assessments of CoP fluctuations in standing and seated positions showed adequate agreement (deviation 9.1%). Furthermore, good internal consistencies with a sufficient test-retest reliability could be demonstrated for the measurements in seated position. Both CoP measurement methods showed a comparable Spearman correlation to obtained extension force measurements (standing: 0.24, seated: 0.23). : Our results show that recording CoP fluctuations in the sitting position is a reliable and valid adjunct to single-leg stance measurements. It could serve as an additional alternative to quantify neuromuscular control in impaired patients who cannot adequately perform the single-leg stance. In addition, measurement in the seated position allows direct recording of neuromuscular control at the trunk.

摘要

评估姿势控制的标准方法是在站立时进行测量。然而,其实施通常受到限制。在坐姿下直接记录躯干上的姿势控制可以提供一种量化神经肌肉控制的替代诊断方法。

对66名健康成年受试者进行了站立位和坐位压力中心(CoP)测量的比较。对23名受试者测试了坐姿测量的可靠性。此外,记录了所有测试受试者的伸展力。

站立位和坐位CoP波动的评估显示出足够的一致性(偏差9.1%)。此外,对于坐姿测量,可以证明具有良好的内部一致性和足够的重测可靠性。两种CoP测量方法与获得的伸展力测量结果均显示出可比的斯皮尔曼相关性(站立位:0.24,坐位:0.23)。

我们的结果表明,记录坐姿下的CoP波动是单腿站立测量的一种可靠且有效的辅助方法。它可以作为一种额外的替代方法,用于量化无法充分进行单腿站立的受损患者的神经肌肉控制。此外,坐位测量允许直接记录躯干处的神经肌肉控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验