Vinatier I, Lorriaux C, Capiod J C, Faille N, Delobel J
Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Hopital Nord, Amiens, France.
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978). 1992;34(2):205-10.
The morphological profiles of red blood cells (RBC) and platelets (Plt) derived from the distribution analysis given by the Coulter STKS were evaluated in two groups of patients suffering from non hematological (n = 293) and hematological (n = 257) conditions. The RBC and Plt flags were studied in terms of sensitivity of the morphological analysis and specificity and significance of each flag. When all RBC and Plt flags were considered, the percentages of false negatives and false positives in our subjects were found to be 4.7% and 13.4% respectively, with a global efficiency of 81.8%. The sensitivity of the alarm system was higher than 90% for all types of abnormality, except microcytosis (81%) and Howell-Jolly bodies (57% over a limited number of 7 cases). The specificity of the STKS response was found to be low except for anisocytosis (88.5%) and macrocytosis (86.1%). It was shown that the flags microcytosis and/or hypochromia and macrocytosis were poorly significant when they appeared in isolation (false positive rates of 86.6% and 84.2% respectively). Thus, these alarms could be eliminated from the review criteria. When considering only the flags anisocytosis, NRBCs, micro RBCs/RBC fragments, dimorphic RBC pop, PLT clumps and giant Plt, the percentage of false positives was 8.1%. However, it must be kept in mind that suspect leucocyte flags remained review criteria, resulting in a final false negative rate of 2.5% for RBC and Plt morphological abnormalities.
在两组分别患有非血液系统疾病(n = 293)和血液系统疾病(n = 257)的患者中,对库尔特STKS给出的红细胞(RBC)和血小板(Plt)分布分析得出的形态学特征进行了评估。从形态学分析的敏感性以及每个标记的特异性和意义方面对RBC和Plt标记进行了研究。当考虑所有RBC和Plt标记时,发现我们研究对象中的假阴性率和假阳性率分别为4.7%和13.4%,总体效率为81.8%。除小红细胞症(81%)和豪-焦小体(在有限的7例中为57%)外,警报系统对所有类型异常的敏感性均高于90%。发现STKS反应的特异性较低,除了红细胞大小不均(88.5%)和大红细胞症(86.1%)。结果表明,小红细胞症和/或低色素性贫血以及大红细胞症单独出现时意义不大(假阳性率分别为86.6%和84.2%)。因此,这些警报可以从审查标准中剔除。仅考虑红细胞大小不均、有核红细胞、小红细胞/红细胞碎片、双形红细胞群、血小板聚集和巨大血小板这些标记时,假阳性率为8.1%。然而,必须记住,可疑白细胞标记仍为审查标准,导致RBC和Plt形态异常的最终假阴性率为2.5%。