Suppr超能文献

静脉血再分布会改变欧姆龙HEM - 705CP的准确性。

Venous blood redistribution alters the accuracy of Omron HEM-705CP.

作者信息

Czarkowski Marek, Mikulska Małgorzata, ZEbrowski Mariusz, Baran Anna, Rózanowski Krzysztof

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2004 Feb;9(1):9-12. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200402000-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Validation procedures of automated blood pressure measuring devices are carried out at rest only.

DESIGN

We aimed to determine whether venous blood redistribution affects the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-705CP (Osc). Lower body negative pressure stimulus (-40 mmHg) (LBNP) was used to simulate changes of body position.

METHODS

Fifty-four young healthy volunteers had their blood pressure (BP) measured simultaneously by Osc and mercury sphygmomanometer (HgS) at rest (at 3 and 5 min) and during LBNP (at 7 and 9 min).

RESULTS

Differences (delta) between HgS and Osc for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) were calculated. The deltaSBP obtained in minute 9 (deltaSBP-9) was bigger than the one taken in minute 5(deltaSBP-5) (-2.89+/- 4.3 versus -1.35+/-5.2 mmHg, P<0.02). The rest of the deltaSBP values and all the deltaDBP values were constant at rest and during venous blood redistribution caused by LBNP. We calculated the fall in SBP separately for HgS and Osc by subtracting SBP-9 from SBP-5 for each patient. The fall measured by Osc was bigger than by HgS (-5.87+/-4.0 versus -4.3+/-4.5 mmHg; P<0.02). When graded according to British Hypertension Society protocol, Osc remained in the class of recommendation (A or B) for every minute of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if an oscillometric device passes various validation tests, they do not give sufficient information about its accuracy during venous blood redistribution. This knowledge is of particular importance when BP regulation abnormalities occurring during changes in body position are diagnosed with the oscillometric method.

摘要

背景

自动血压测量设备的验证程序仅在静息状态下进行。

设计

我们旨在确定静脉血再分布是否会影响欧姆龙HEM - 705CP(振荡法)的准确性。采用下体负压刺激(-40 mmHg)(LBNP)来模拟体位变化。

方法

54名年轻健康志愿者在静息状态下(3分钟和5分钟时)以及LBNP期间(7分钟和9分钟时),同时通过振荡法和汞柱式血压计(HgS)测量血压(BP)。

结果

计算HgS和振荡法测量的收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)之间的差值(delta)。第9分钟获得的deltaSBP(deltaSBP - 9)大于第5分钟的(deltaSBP - 5)(-2.89±4.3对-1.35±5.2 mmHg,P<0.02)。其余的deltaSBP值以及所有的deltaDBP值在静息状态和LBNP引起的静脉血再分布期间保持恒定。我们通过从每位患者的SBP - 5中减去SBP - 9,分别计算HgS和振荡法测量的SBP下降值。振荡法测量的下降值大于HgS(-5.87±4.0对-4.3±4.5 mmHg;P<0.02)。根据英国高血压学会方案分级时,振荡法在该程序的每一分钟都保持在推荐类别(A或B)。

结论

即使一种示波法设备通过了各种验证测试,但它们并未提供关于其在静脉血再分布期间准确性的充分信息。当采用示波法诊断体位变化期间发生的血压调节异常时,这一知识尤为重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验