Woodruff T J, Bois F Y, Auslander D, Spear R C
Bioengineering and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
Risk Anal. 1992 Jun;12(2):189-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00667.x.
There has been an increasing interest in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in the area of risk assessment. The use of these models raises two important issues: (1) How good are PBPK models for predicting experimental kinetic data? (2) How is the variability in the model output affected by the number of parameters and the structure of the model? To examine these issues, we compared a five-compartment PBPK model, a three-compartment PBPK model, and nonphysiological compartmental models of benzene pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulations were used to take into account the variability of the parameters. The models were fitted to three sets of experimental data and a hypothetical experiment was simulated with each model to provide a uniform basis for comparison. Two main results are presented: (1) the difference is larger between the predictions of the same model fitted to different data sets than between the predictions of different models fitted to the dame data; and (2) the type of data used to fit the model has a larger effect on the variability of the predictions than the type of model and the number of parameters.
在风险评估领域,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型越来越受到关注。使用这些模型引发了两个重要问题:(1)PBPK模型预测实验动力学数据的效果如何?(2)模型输出的变异性如何受到参数数量及模型结构的影响?为研究这些问题,我们比较了一个五室PBPK模型、一个三室PBPK模型以及苯药代动力学的非生理房室模型。采用蒙特卡罗模拟来考虑参数的变异性。将这些模型与三组实验数据进行拟合,并对每个模型模拟一个假设实验,以提供统一的比较基础。给出了两个主要结果:(1)同一模型拟合不同数据集时预测结果的差异,大于不同模型拟合相同数据集时预测结果的差异;(2)用于拟合模型的数据类型对预测变异性的影响,大于模型类型和参数数量的影响。