Mattheos Nikos, Nattestad Anders, Falk-Nilsson Eva, Attström Rolf
Department of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.
Med Educ. 2004 Apr;38(4):378-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01788.x.
The ability to self-assess one's competence is a crucial skill for all health professionals. The interactive examination is an assessment model aiming to evaluate not only students' clinical skills and competence, but also their ability to self-assess their proficiency.
The methodology utilised students' own self-assessment, an answer to a written essay question and a group discussion. Students' self-assessment was matched to the judgement of their instructors. As a final task, students compared their own essay to one written by an "expert". The differences pointed by students in their comparison documents and the accompanying arguments were analysed and categorised. Students received individual feedback on their performance and learning needs. The model was tested on 1 cohort of undergraduate dental students (year 2001, n = 52) in their third semester of studies, replacing an older form of examination in the discipline of clinical periodontology.
Students' acceptance of the methodology was very positive. Students tended to overestimate their competence in relation to the judgement of their instructors in diagnostic skills, but not in skills relevant to treatment. No gender differences were observed, although females performed better than males in the examination. Three categories of differences were observed in the students' comparison documents. The accompanying arguments may reveal students' understanding and methods of prioritising.
Students tended to overestimate their competence in diagnostic rather than treatment skills. The interactive examination appeared to be a convenient tool for providing deeper insight into students' ability to prioritise, self-assess and steer their own learning.
自我评估能力是所有卫生专业人员的一项关键技能。交互式考试是一种评估模式,旨在不仅评估学生的临床技能和能力,还评估他们自我评估熟练程度的能力。
该方法利用了学生自己的自我评估、对一篇书面论文问题的回答以及小组讨论。学生的自我评估与他们导师的判断相匹配。作为最后一项任务,学生将自己的论文与一篇由“专家”撰写的论文进行比较。分析并分类学生在比较文件中指出的差异以及附带的论据。学生收到了关于他们表现和学习需求的个人反馈。该模式在一组本科牙科学生(2001级,n = 52)的第三学期进行了测试,取代了临床牙周病学学科中旧的考试形式。
学生对该方法的接受度非常积极。在诊断技能方面,学生相对于导师的判断往往高估自己的能力,但在与治疗相关的技能方面并非如此。未观察到性别差异,尽管在考试中女生表现优于男生。在学生的比较文件中观察到三类差异。附带的论据可能揭示学生的理解和优先排序方法。
学生往往高估自己在诊断技能而非治疗技能方面的能力。交互式考试似乎是一个方便的工具,可用于更深入地了解学生的优先排序、自我评估和引导自己学习的能力。