Devineni Trishul, Blanchard Edward B, Hickling Edward J, Buckley Todd C
University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(2):211-31. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00247-5.
The modified or "emotional" Stroop paradigm has been frequently employed in previous evaluations of information processing models of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other anxiety disorders. These studies have frequently documented an attentional bias to trauma-specific threatening stimuli in PTSD patients. However, the response of the Stroop color-naming interference effect to psychological treatment has yet to be tested in a trauma population. The present study evaluated the effects of three treatment conditions on the Stroop interference effect in motor vehicle accident (MVA) survivors with PTSD. Following treatment, participants were classified as either treatment responders or nonresponders. Participants named the color of three types of stimuli: MVA trauma-specific words, neutral words, and nonwords. Results showed that change in selective color-naming interference for trauma cues was unrelated to treatment response or modality at either posttreatment or follow-up. Findings cast doubt on the clinical utility of the modified Stroop test as a measure of treatment outcome in this population.
改良或“情绪性”斯特鲁普范式在先前对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和其他焦虑症信息处理模型的评估中经常被采用。这些研究经常记录到PTSD患者对创伤特异性威胁刺激存在注意偏向。然而,斯特鲁普颜色命名干扰效应在心理治疗中的反应尚未在创伤人群中进行测试。本研究评估了三种治疗条件对患有PTSD的机动车事故(MVA)幸存者的斯特鲁普干扰效应的影响。治疗后,参与者被分为治疗反应者或无反应者。参与者说出三种类型刺激的颜色:MVA创伤特异性词语、中性词语和非词语。结果表明,创伤线索的选择性颜色命名干扰的变化在治疗后或随访时与治疗反应或方式均无关。研究结果对改良斯特鲁普测试作为该人群治疗结果衡量指标的临床效用提出了质疑。