• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍的眼动追踪指标对威胁的注意:系统评价。

Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry,Columbia University Medical Center,New York Psychiatric Institute,New York, NY,USA.

New York Psychiatric Institute,New York, NY,USA.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291718002313
PMID:30178728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6399079/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) implicate threat-related attentional biases in the etiology and phenomenology of the disorder. However, extant attentional research using reaction time (RT)-based paradigms and measures has yielded mixed results. Eye-tracking methodology has emerged in recent years to overcome several inherent drawbacks of RT-based tasks, striving to better delineate attentional processes.

METHODS

A systematic review of experimental studies examining threat-related attention biases in PTSD, using eye-tracking methodology and group-comparison designs, was conducted conforming to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were selected following a systematic search for publications between 1980 and December 2017 in PsycINFO, MEDLINE and the National Center for PTSD Research's Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress (PILOTS) database. Additional records were identified by employing the Similar Articles feature in PubMed, and the Cited Reference Search in ISI Web of Science. Reference sections of review articles, book chapters and studies selected for inclusion were searched for further studies. Ongoing studies were also sought through Clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (n = 456 participants in total) were included in the final review. Results indicated little support for enhanced threat detection, hypervigilance and attentional avoidance. However, consistent evidence emerged for sustained attention on threat (i.e. attention maintenance) in PTSD.

CONCLUSIONS

This review is the first to systematically evaluate extant findings in PTSD emanating from eye-tracking studies employing group-comparison designs. Results suggest that sustained attention on threat might serve as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的认知模型表明,威胁相关的注意力偏差与该障碍的病因和表现有关。然而,使用基于反应时间(RT)的范式和测量方法的现有注意力研究得出的结果喜忧参半。近年来,眼动追踪方法学的出现克服了基于 RT 任务的几个固有缺陷,努力更好地描绘注意力过程。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,对使用眼动追踪方法学和组间比较设计来研究 PTSD 中威胁相关注意力偏差的实验研究进行了系统综述。通过在 PsycINFO、MEDLINE 和国家创伤后应激障碍研究中心出版的国际创伤应激文献(PILOTS)数据库中进行系统搜索,选择了符合条件的研究。通过在 PubMed 中使用“相似文章”功能和 ISI Web of Science 中的“被引参考文献搜索”,确定了其他记录。还通过 Clinicaltrials.gov 搜索正在进行的研究。检索了综述文章、章节和入选研究的参考文献部分,以寻找进一步的研究。

结果

最终综述共纳入 11 项研究(共 456 名参与者)。结果表明,几乎没有证据支持增强的威胁检测、过度警惕和注意力回避。然而,一致的证据表明 PTSD 中存在对威胁的持续注意力(即注意力维持)。

结论

这是第一篇系统评估采用组间比较设计的眼动追踪研究中 PTSD 现有发现的综述。结果表明,对威胁的持续注意力可能成为治疗干预的潜在目标。

相似文献

1
Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍的眼动追踪指标对威胁的注意:系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Attention allocation in OCD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking-based research.强迫症中的注意力分配:基于眼动追踪研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.141. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Attention to threat images in individuals with clinical and subthreshold symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍临床症状和亚临床症状个体对威胁图像的注意力。
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Jun;27(5):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 24.
5
Gender Differences in Threat Biases: Trauma Type Matters in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.性别差异在威胁偏见中:创伤类型在创伤后应激障碍中很重要。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):701-711. doi: 10.1002/jts.22439. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
6
Attentional bias in German Armed Forces veterans with and without posttraumatic stress symptoms - An eye-tracking investigation and group comparison.创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人和无创伤后应激症状的德国武装部队退伍军人的注意力偏差:一项眼动追踪研究和组间比较。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;76:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101726. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Attentional bias toward negative stimuli in PTSD: an eye-tracking study.创伤后应激障碍中对负面刺激的注意偏向:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;53(12):5809-5817. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003063. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
9
Eye-tracking indices of attention allocation and attention bias variability are differently related to trauma exposure and PTSD.眼动追踪指标中的注意力分配和注意力偏差可变性与创伤暴露和 PTSD 有不同的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 May;96:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Dwelling on potential threat cues: an eye movement marker for combat-related PTSD.关注潜在威胁线索:与战斗相关 PTSD 的眼动标记物。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 May;30(5):497-502. doi: 10.1002/da.22115.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory study of emotional forecasting and experience disparities in PTSD: insights from a virtual reality paradigm.创伤后应激障碍中情绪预测与体验差异的探索性研究:来自虚拟现实范式的见解
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2524289. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2524289. Epub 2025 Aug 25.
2
Early processing of traumatic material and contextual information in posttraumatic stress disorder and its relation to memory impairments.创伤后应激障碍中创伤性材料和情境信息的早期处理及其与记忆障碍的关系
Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00322-w.
3
Temporal dynamics in attentional bias toward shopping cues among problematic online shoppers.

本文引用的文献

1
Free viewing of sad and happy faces in depression: A potential target for attention bias modification.抑郁症患者观看悲伤和快乐的面孔时无需付费:一种潜在的注意力偏向修正目标。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.047. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?注意偏向威胁:危机还是机遇?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
The reliability of eyetracking to assess attentional bias to threatening words in healthy individuals.
问题型网络购物者对购物线索的注意偏向中的时间动态变化。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Apr 28;14(2):1079-1094. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00038. Print 2025 Jul 2.
4
Maternal Experiences of Trauma and Toddler Multisensory Attention Skills in a South African Community Cohort.南非社区队列中母亲的创伤经历与幼儿多感官注意力技能
Infancy. 2025 Mar-Apr;30(2):e70017. doi: 10.1111/infa.70017.
5
Examining attentional avoidance in post-traumatic stress disorder: an exploratory 'Face in the Crowd' paradigm using eye-tracking.创伤后应激障碍中注意力回避的研究:一项使用眼动追踪技术的探索性“人群中的面孔”范式
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2462489. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2462489. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
6
Comment on: Attentional bias modification and attention control training in PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对《创伤后应激障碍中的注意偏向矫正与注意控制训练:系统评价与荟萃分析》的评论
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024 Sep 17;14:20451253241278872. doi: 10.1177/20451253241278872. eCollection 2024.
7
Frequency-encoded eye tracking smart contact lens for human-machine interaction.用于人机交互的频域编码智能隐形眼镜眼动追踪系统。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 27;15(1):3588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47851-y.
8
Recognizing and Looking at Masked Emotional Faces in Alexithymia.述情障碍者对伪装情绪面孔的识别与观察
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;14(4):343. doi: 10.3390/bs14040343.
9
Does disconfirmatory evidence shape safety-and danger-related beliefs of trauma-exposed individuals?否定性证据是否会影响创伤暴露个体的安全和危险相关信念?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2335788. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2335788. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
Racial Microaggressions Mediate the Association Between Posttraumatic Stress and Alcohol Use Among Women of Color Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence.种族微侵犯在经历亲密伴侣暴力的有色人种女性的创伤后应激和酒精使用之间起中介作用。
J Dual Diagn. 2024 Oct-Dec;20(4):303-317. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2024.2336629. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
眼动追踪评估健康个体对威胁性词语的注意偏向的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1778-1792. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y.
4
It Is Time to Address the Crisis in the Pharmacotherapy of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Consensus Statement of the PTSD Psychopharmacology Working Group.是时候应对创伤后应激障碍药物治疗的危机了:创伤后应激障碍精神药理学工作组的共识声明。
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;82(7):e51-e59. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Generalized Anxiety Disorder, worry and attention to threat: A systematic review.广泛性焦虑障碍、担忧和对威胁的关注:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;54:107-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Gaze-Contingent Music Reward Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.注视 contingent 音乐奖励疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):649-656. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16080894. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
7
Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study.急性应激背景下对负面情绪信息的注意偏向及其与日常担忧的关系:一项眼动追踪研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Mar;90:96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
8
Capturing Dynamics of Biased Attention: Are New Attention Variability Measures the Way Forward?捕捉偏向性注意力的动态变化:新的注意力变异性测量方法是前进的方向吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0166600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166600. eCollection 2016.
9
Relationships among attention networks and physiological responding to threat.注意网络与对威胁的生理反应之间的关系。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
Neural Substrates of Overgeneralized Conditioned Fear in PTSD.创伤后应激障碍中过度泛化的条件性恐惧的神经基础
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;174(2):125-134. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15121549. Epub 2016 Oct 31.