Suppr超能文献

改良多平台技术诱导的睡眠剥夺:睡眠丧失及恢复的量化

Sleep deprivation induced by the modified multiple platform technique: quantification of sleep loss and recovery.

作者信息

Machado Ricardo Borges, Hipólide Débora C, Benedito-Silva Ana Amélia, Tufik Sergio

机构信息

Psychobiology Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Napoleão de Barros 925, Sao Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2004 Apr 9;1004(1-2):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.01.019.

Abstract

Vigilance status was continually monitored in socially stable groups of rats exposed to the modified multiple platform (MMP) technique for sleep deprivation. For comparison, sleep parameters were also monitored in socially isolated rats deprived of sleep by the single platform (SP) method. In all cases, sleep was continuously recorded during baseline, during 96 h of sleep deprivation and during 4 days of recovery. Both multiple- and single-platform techniques completely abolished paradoxical sleep (PS) during the deprivation period, but also resulted in significant decreases in slow wave sleep (SWS) (-31% and -37%, respectively). Unexpectedly, animals on large platforms, which are normally intended as controls, also showed significant reductions in PS and SWS, and these effects were more pronounced in rats deprived in groups than in animals deprived in isolation. Another control preparation, rats placed on wire-mesh grids in the deprivation tank, also showed PS reduction (-39%) but no loss of SWS during the 4 test days. Paradoxical sleep rebound was observed in the first 24 h in all groups, except for grid controls. Overall, no significant differences were found between single- and multiple-platform procedures during the 4 days of deprivation. However, sleep rebound was more pronounced in MMP-deprived rats than in SP-deprived rats. Sleep loss in both control groups may reflect residual effect of stress that remain in the platform technique. These findings indicate that the MMP technique is effective in inducing PS deprivation (PSD). However, the fact that SWS is also affected may have implications for conclusions on paradoxical sleep function based upon paradoxical sleep deprivation.

摘要

在采用改良多平台(MMP)技术剥夺睡眠的社会稳定大鼠群体中,持续监测警觉状态。作为比较,还对采用单平台(SP)方法剥夺睡眠的社会隔离大鼠的睡眠参数进行了监测。在所有情况下,均在基线期、96小时睡眠剥夺期和4天恢复期持续记录睡眠情况。多平台和单平台技术在剥夺期均完全消除了异相睡眠(PS),但也导致慢波睡眠(SWS)显著减少(分别减少31%和37%)。出乎意料的是,通常作为对照的大平台上的动物,其PS和SWS也显著降低,且这些影响在群居剥夺的大鼠中比在单独剥夺的动物中更明显。另一种对照准备,即置于剥夺箱金属丝网格栅上的大鼠,在4天测试期内也显示PS减少(39%),但SWS未减少。除格栅对照组外,所有组在最初24小时均观察到异相睡眠反弹。总体而言,在4天剥夺期内,单平台和多平台程序之间未发现显著差异。然而,MMP剥夺的大鼠比SP剥夺的大鼠睡眠反弹更明显。两个对照组的睡眠丧失可能反映了平台技术中残留的应激效应。这些发现表明,MMP技术在诱导异相睡眠剥夺(PSD)方面是有效的。然而,SWS也受到影响这一事实可能会对基于异相睡眠剥夺得出的异相睡眠功能结论产生影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验