Hartmann Michael, Knoth Holger, Schulz Diane, Knoth Sven, Meier-Hellmann Andreas
Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
J Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):265-8. doi: 10.1177/0885066603255683.
The purpose of this analysis of health economic studies in the field of intensive and critical care was to investigate whether any relationship could be established between type of sponsorship and (1) type of economic analysis, (2) health technology assessed, (3) sensitivity analysis performed, (4) publication status, and (5) qualitative cost assessment. Using the terms critical care or intensive care, all health economics publications in the field of critical and intensive care were identified in the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED, Version 1995-2001) on the basis of sponsorship and comparative studies. This search yielded a total of 42 eligible articles. Their evaluations were prepared independently by 2 investigators on the basis of specific criteria. When evaluators disagreed, a third investigator provided a deciding evaluation. There was no statistically demonstrable relationship between types of sponsorship and sensitivity analysis performed, publication status, types of economic analysis, or qualitative cost assessment.
本次对重症监护领域卫生经济学研究的分析目的在于，探究赞助类型与以下方面之间是否能建立联系：（1）经济分析类型；（2）所评估的卫生技术；（3）进行的敏感性分析；（4）发表状态；（5）定性成本评估。使用“重症监护”或“加强护理”等术语，在《卫生经济评估数据库》（HEED，1995 - 2001版）中，基于赞助情况和对比研究，识别出重症和加强护理领域的所有卫生经济学出版物。此次检索共得到42篇符合条件的文章。两名研究人员根据特定标准独立对这些文章进行评估。当评估人员意见不一致时，由第三名研究人员给出决定性评估。赞助类型与所进行的敏感性分析、发表状态、经济分析类型或定性成本评估之间不存在统计学上可证明的关系。
