Greischar Lawrence L, Burghy Cory A, van Reekum Carien M, Jackson Daren C, Pizzagalli Diego A, Mueller Corrina, Davidson Richard J
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Brogden Hall, Room 371, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Mar;115(3):710-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.028.
High-density EEG recording offers increased spatial resolution but requires careful consideration of how the density of electrodes affects the potentials being measured. Power differences as a function of electrode density and electrolyte spreading were examined and a method for correcting these differences was tested.
Separate EEG recordings from 8 participants were made using a high-density electrode net, first with 6 of 128 electrodes active followed by recordings with all electrodes active. For a subset of 4 participants measurements were counterbalanced with recordings made in the reversed order by drying the hair after the high-density recordings and using a fresh dry electrode net of the same size for the low-density recordings. Mean power values over 6 resting eyes open/closed EEG recordings at the 6 active electrodes common to both recording conditions were compared. Evidence for possible electrolyte spreading or bridging between electrodes was acquired by computing Hjorth electrical distances. Spherical spline interpolation was tested for correcting power values at electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading for these participants and for a subset of participants from a larger previous study.
For both the complete set and the counterbalanced subset, significant decreases in power at the 6 common electrodes for the high-density recordings were observed across the range of the standard EEG bands (1-44 Hz). The number of bridges or amount of electrolyte spreading towards the reference electrode as evidenced by small Hjorth electrical distances served as a predictor of this power decrease. Spherical spline interpolation increased the power values at electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading and by a significant amount for the larger number of participants in the second group.
Understanding signal effects caused by closely spaced electrodes, detecting electrolyte spreading and correcting its effects are important considerations for high-density EEG recordings. A combination of scalp maps of power density and plots of small Hjorth electrical distances can be used to identify electrodes affected by electrolyte spreading. Interpolation using spherical splines offers a method for correcting the potentials measured at these electrodes.
高密度脑电图记录可提高空间分辨率,但需要仔细考虑电极密度如何影响所测量的电位。研究了功率差异作为电极密度和电解质扩散的函数,并测试了一种校正这些差异的方法。
使用高密度电极网对8名参与者进行单独的脑电图记录,首先激活128个电极中的6个,然后激活所有电极进行记录。对于4名参与者的子集,测量进行了平衡,通过在高密度记录后吹干头发并使用相同尺寸的新鲜干电极网进行低密度记录,以相反的顺序进行记录。比较了两种记录条件下共同的6个活跃电极上6次静息睁眼/闭眼脑电图记录的平均功率值。通过计算约尔特电距离来获取电极之间可能存在电解质扩散或桥接的证据。对这些参与者以及来自先前一项更大规模研究的一部分参与者,测试了球面样条插值法以校正受电解质扩散影响的电极处的功率值。
对于完整数据集和平衡子集,在标准脑电图频段(1 - 44 Hz)范围内,高密度记录的6个共同电极处的功率均显著降低。由小约尔特电距离证明的朝向参考电极的桥接数量或电解质扩散量可作为这种功率降低的预测指标。球面样条插值法提高了受电解质扩散影响的电极处的功率值,并且对于第二组中更多的参与者,提高幅度显著。
了解紧密间隔电极引起的信号效应、检测电解质扩散并校正其影响是高密度脑电图记录的重要考虑因素。功率密度头皮图和约尔特电距离小图的组合可用于识别受电解质扩散影响的电极。使用球面样条进行插值提供了一种校正这些电极处测量电位的方法。