• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.

作者信息

McMahon Catherine A

机构信息

Macquarie University, Australia.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):272-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60909-1.

DOI:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60909-1
PMID:15038893
Abstract

This commentary argues that notwithstanding the implicit logic underpinning philosophical and moral arguments regarding individual rights to access sex selection for non-medical reasons, community concerns about the psychosocial impact of the technology cannot be dismissed or ignored. It is true, however, that such concerns are often based on unsupported assumptions about the impact of the technology on individuals, families and communities and about the propensity of scientists, unless restrained, to act in ways that are irresponsible or dangerous. The research conducted to date has dispelled many of the myths and assumptions about IVF children and their families. Further careful research is now needed to test the extent to which fears and assumptions regarding 'designer babies' are justified.

摘要

相似文献

1
Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):272-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60909-1.
2
Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):268-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60907-8.
3
Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):270-1. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60908-x.
4
The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.支持自由的推定:对人类受精与胚胎学管理局关于性别选择的公众咨询的评论
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Mar;8(3):266-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60906-6.
5
Procreative liberty, or collective responsibility? Comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law, and on Dahl's response.生育自由,还是集体责任?评下议院关于人类生殖技术与法律的报告以及达尔的回应。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Aug;11(2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60951-0.
6
Response to 'No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law'.对《没有国家是孤岛:关于下议院报告〈人类生殖技术与法律〉的评论》的回应
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Jul;11(1):12. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61289-8.
7
No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.没有一个国家能孤立存在:对下议院关于人类生殖技术与法律的报告的评论
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Jul;11(1):10-1. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61288-6.
8
Concerns of sex selection and regulation in the report on Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.《人类生殖技术与法律报告》中关于性别选择及相关监管的问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Jul;11(1):13-4. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61290-4.
9
Beyond IVF: should parents be free to decide what is acceptable?
New Sci. 2006;192(2574):5.
10
WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.公众舆论在伦理法律决策中应扮演什么角色?以利用植入前基因诊断进行非医学原因的性别选择为例。
Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):34-58. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046. Epub 2016 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections.出于非医学及中间原因的孕前性别选择:伦理思考
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(4):267-77.