• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化治疗建议未能改善单纯性高血压门诊患者的健康结局:一项随机对照试验的结果。

Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Murray Michael D, Harris Lisa E, Overhage J Marc, Zhou Xiao-Hua, Eckert George J, Smith Faye E, Buchanan Nancy Nienaber, Wolinsky Fredric D, McDonald Clement J, Tierney William M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Mar;24(3):324-37. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173.

DOI:10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173
PMID:15040645
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of evidence-based treatment suggestions for hypertension made to physicians and pharmacists using a comprehensive electronic medical record system.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design of physician and pharmacist interventions, which resulted in four groups of patients: physician intervention only, pharmacist intervention only, intervention by physician and pharmacist, and intervention by neither physician nor pharmacist (control).

SETTING

Academic primary care internal medicine practice.

SUBJECTS

Seven hundred twelve patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Suggestions were displayed to physicians on computer workstations used to write outpatient orders and to pharmacists when filling prescriptions. The primary end point was generic health-related quality of life. Secondary end points were symptom profile and side effects from antihypertensive drugs, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, patient satisfaction with physicians and pharmacists, drug therapy compliance, and health care charges. In the control group, implementation of care changes in accordance with treatment suggestions was observed in 26% of patients. In the intervention groups, compliance with suggestions was poor, with treatment suggestions implemented in 25% of patients for whom suggestions were displayed only to pharmacists, 29% of those for whom suggestions were displayed only to physicians, and 35% of the group for whom both physicians and pharmacists received suggestions (p=0.13). Intergroup differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant for generic health-related quality of life, symptom and side-effect profiles, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, charges, or drug therapy compliance.

CONCLUSION

Computer-based intervention using a sophisticated electronic physician order-entry system failed to improve compliance with treatment suggestions or outcomes of patients with uncomplicated hypertension.

摘要

研究目的

评估使用综合电子病历系统向医生和药剂师提供的高血压循证治疗建议的效果。

设计

采用2×2析因设计的随机对照试验,涉及医生和药剂师干预,产生四组患者:仅医生干预、仅药剂师干预、医生和药剂师联合干预以及医生和药剂师均不干预(对照组)。

地点

学术性初级保健内科诊所。

研究对象

712例无并发症的高血压患者。

测量指标及主要结果

建议在用于开具门诊医嘱的计算机工作站上显示给医生,并在配药时显示给药剂师。主要终点是与健康相关的总体生活质量。次要终点包括症状特征和抗高血压药物的副作用、急诊就诊和住院次数、血压测量、患者对医生和药剂师的满意度、药物治疗依从性以及医疗费用。在对照组中,26%的患者根据治疗建议实施了护理变更。在干预组中,对建议的依从性较差,仅向药剂师显示建议的患者中有25%实施了治疗建议,仅向医生显示建议的患者中有29%实施了治疗建议,医生和药剂师均收到建议的组中有35%实施了治疗建议(p = 0.13)。在与健康相关的总体生活质量、症状和副作用特征、急诊就诊和住院次数、血压测量、费用或药物治疗依从性方面,组间差异无统计学意义且无临床相关性。

结论

使用复杂的电子医生医嘱录入系统进行基于计算机的干预未能提高无并发症高血压患者对治疗建议的依从性或改善其治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial.计算机化治疗建议未能改善单纯性高血压门诊患者的健康结局:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Mar;24(3):324-37. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173.
2
Can computer-generated evidence-based care suggestions enhance evidence-based management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomized, controlled trial.计算机生成的循证护理建议能否加强哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的循证管理?一项随机对照试验。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):477-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00368.x.
3
Evaluation of Pharmacists' Work in a Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model for the Management of Hypertension.在医师 - 药师协作管理高血压模式下对药师工作的评估
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Apr;36(4):374-84. doi: 10.1002/phar.1727. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
Physician-pharmacist comanagement of hypertension: a randomized, comparative trial.高血压的医生-药剂师共同管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Feb;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.2.209.32096.
5
A controlled trial of including symptom data in computer-based care suggestions for managing patients with chronic heart failure.一项关于在基于计算机的慢性心力衰竭患者管理护理建议中纳入症状数据的对照试验。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):375-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.021.
6
Description of pharmacist interventions during physician-pharmacist co-management of hypertension.高血压医生-药师联合管理期间药师干预措施的描述
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Jan;30(1):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9155-6. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
7
Improving blood pressure control in a pharmacist-managed hypertension clinic.在药剂师管理的高血压诊所中改善血压控制
Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Dec;22(12):1533-40. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.17.1533.34127.
8
Using pharmacists to improve risk stratification and management of stage 3A chronic kidney disease: a feasibility study.利用药剂师改善3A期慢性肾脏病的风险分层与管理:一项可行性研究
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0383-7.
9
Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.初级保健中管理心脏病的计算机化指南的效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):967-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x.
10
Deterioration of blood pressure control after discontinuation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention.停止医生-药剂师合作干预后血压控制的恶化。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Mar;30(3):228-35. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.3.228.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilevel Interventions Demonstrate Mixed Effectiveness for Improving Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Rapid Review.多级干预对改善血压结果的有效性参差不齐:一项快速综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1397. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121397.
2
Pharmacists delivering hypertension care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.提供高血压护理服务的药剂师:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 14;12:1477729. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1477729. eCollection 2025.
3
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.
卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.将临床决策支持概念化为复杂干预措施:一项比较有效性试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Sep 12;29(10):1744-1756. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac089.
5
Do electronic reminders alter recorded diagnoses in primary care office-hours practices of health centers: A register-based study in a Finnish city.电子提醒能否改变健康中心初级保健门诊记录的诊断结果:芬兰某城市一项基于登记册的研究
SAGE Open Med. 2021 Jul 29;9:20503121211036117. doi: 10.1177/20503121211036117. eCollection 2021.
6
Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.计算机化临床决策支持系统与护理质量的绝对改善:对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3216.
7
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
8
Efficacy of Patient Activation Interventions With or Without Financial Incentives to Promote Prescribing of Thiazides and Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者激活干预措施(有或没有财务激励)对噻嗪类药物的开具和高血压控制的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185017. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5017.
9
Economic Evaluation of the Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Case Management to Control Hypertension (Hyperlink) Trial.家庭血压远程监测与药剂师病例管理控制高血压(超链接)试验的经济学评估
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;1(1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1001. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
10
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.