Saari Jukka M, Summanen Paula, Kivelä Tero, Saari K Matti
Laboratory of Computational Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Apr;82(2):126-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00240.x.
To assess three novel digital fundus cameras for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening.
Digital colour and red-free retinal imaging (Topcon TRC 50 IA, Canon CR6-45NM, and MediTell) was used to capture 427 images of 70 diabetes patients and control subjects. The images were graded for DR by three readers in a randomized and masked manner using a modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study classification. The reference standard was based on mydriatic ophthalmoscopy and colour and red-free images.
Digital 50 degrees red-free imaging had sensitivity of 97.7%, two-field 50 degrees colour imaging 94.0%, and two-field 45 degrees colour imaging sensitivity of 88.9%. The specificity of these imaging modalities was 98.9-100%, and ungradeable images represented 1.2-1.6%. The hand-held digital colour videocamera (MediTell) showed a sensitivity of 6.9% and ungradeable images represented 92.3%.
Digital 50 degrees red-free and two-field 50 degrees or 45 degrees colour imaging were suitable for DR screening, whereas the hand-held digital videocamera did not fulfil the needs of DR screening.
评估三款新型数字眼底相机用于糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查的效果。
使用数字彩色和无赤视网膜成像(拓普康TRC 50 IA、佳能CR6 - 45NM和MediTell)对70名糖尿病患者和对照受试者的427张图像进行采集。由三名阅片者采用改良的糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究分级方法,以随机和盲法对图像进行DR分级。参考标准基于散瞳检眼镜检查以及彩色和无赤图像。
数字50度无赤成像的敏感度为97.7%,双视野50度彩色成像为94.0%,双视野45度彩色成像敏感度为88.9%。这些成像方式的特异度为98.9% - 100%,不可分级图像占1.2% - 1.6%。手持式数字彩色摄像机(MediTell)的敏感度为6.9%,不可分级图像占92.3%。
数字50度无赤以及双视野50度或45度彩色成像适用于DR筛查,而手持式数字摄像机无法满足DR筛查需求。