Gupta S C, Sinha Subodh Kumar, Dagar Abhishek B
Venu Eye Institute & Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2013 Oct;138(4):531-5.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: There is a concern on the quality and the usefulness of teleophthalmology images, particularly those using indigenous equipment, in making a diagnosis and treatment decisions in ophthalmology. The present study was done to compare the level of agreement and sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis and management decisions of various eye diseases by teleophthalmology using indigenous equipment, compared to the in-clinic assessment.
Patients having different eye diseases were evaluated by two ophthalmologists - one ophthalmologist examined the patient in clinic setting while the other ophthalmologist made the diagnosis and management decision based on images sent by teleophthalmology. The images were taken by the ophthalmic technician using digital imaging system and fundus camera. The clinical findings and management decisions by the two ophthalmologists were masked to each others.
In diagnosis of anterior segment eye diseases such as cataract and corneal diseases there was good to very good agreement (kappa values of 0.68 and 0.91 for cataract and corneal diseases respectively) between in-clinic assessment and assessment by teleophthalmology. There was moderate agreement (kappa values of 0.52 and 0.48 for glaucoma and retinal diseases respectively) between in-clinic assessment and assessment by teleophthalmology for the diagnosis of glaucoma and retinal diseases. For the management decisions of patients, there was moderate level of agreement in all groups of eye diseases.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Teleophthalmology, using indigenous equipment was found to be effective in diagnosis and management decision of anterior segment eye diseases such as cataract and cornea, and with some modification and continuous training to the technicians could become an effective tool for screening and referral of glaucoma and retinal diseases.
人们担心远程眼科图像的质量和实用性,尤其是那些使用国产设备获取的图像,在眼科诊断和治疗决策中存在问题。本研究旨在比较使用国产设备的远程眼科与门诊评估在各种眼病诊断和管理决策方面的一致性水平、敏感性和特异性。
由两位眼科医生对患有不同眼病的患者进行评估——一位眼科医生在门诊环境中检查患者,另一位眼科医生根据远程眼科发送的图像做出诊断和管理决策。图像由眼科技术人员使用数字成像系统和眼底相机拍摄。两位眼科医生的临床发现和管理决策相互保密。
在前段眼病如白内障和角膜疾病的诊断中,门诊评估与远程眼科评估之间有良好到非常好的一致性(白内障和角膜疾病的kappa值分别为0.68和0.91)。在青光眼和视网膜疾病的诊断方面,门诊评估与远程眼科评估之间有中等程度的一致性(青光眼和视网膜疾病的kappa值分别为0.52和0.48)。对于患者的管理决策,在所有眼病组中都有中等程度的一致性。
发现使用国产设备的远程眼科在前段眼病如白内障和角膜疾病的诊断和管理决策中是有效的,并且对技术人员进行一些改进和持续培训后,可成为青光眼和视网膜疾病筛查及转诊的有效工具。