Qiu Zhibing, Chen Xin, Xu Ming, Jiang Yingshuo, Xiao Liqiong, Liu Lele, Wang Liming
Department of Thoracic and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Heart Institute, 210006 Nanjing, PR China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jul 27;4:39. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-4-39.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the safety and the cost-effectiveness of using preoperative IABP as support compared with postoperative IABP treatment in coronary patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (SLVD) who is undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB), including early outcomes, hospital mortality and morbidity, and mid-term follow-up outcomes.
Between March 2000 and December 2008, we prospectively and randomly studied the insertion of preoperative IABP in 115 (7.4%) and postoperative IABP in 106 (6.8%) of the 1560 consecutive patients. Group A is preoperative IABP therapy. Group B is postoperative IABP therapy.
There was no significant difference in the number of grafts used between the two groups. Completeness of revascularization did not differ between the two groups. The statistically significant difference was hospital mortality (2.6% in group A vs. 3.8% in group B) (p < 0.05). And there was significant reduction in postoperative low cardiac output, malignant arrhythmia, acute renal failure and length of stay in ICU in group A, compared with group B (p < 0.05). In the two groups, six-, 12-, 24- and 48-month survival rates were similar. In the study the degree of improvement in angina and quality of life did not differ significantly between the two groups.
The use of preoperative IABP in SLVD patients undergoing OPCAB is of safety and effectiveness. The combined use of preoperative IABP and OPCAB allows complete revascularization in SLVD patients with an important reduction in operative mortality and excellent mid-term results.
本研究旨在评估在接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(OPCAB)的严重左心室功能不全(SLVD)冠心病患者中,术前使用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)作为支持与术后使用IABP治疗相比的安全性和成本效益,包括早期结果、医院死亡率和发病率以及中期随访结果。
在2000年3月至2008年12月期间,我们对1560例连续患者中的115例(7.4%)术前IABP置入和106例(6.8%)术后IABP置入进行了前瞻性随机研究。A组为术前IABP治疗。B组为术后IABP治疗。
两组间使用的移植血管数量无显著差异。两组间血管重建的完整性无差异。统计学上的显著差异是医院死亡率(A组为2.6%,B组为3.8%)(p<0.05)。与B组相比,A组术后低心输出量、恶性心律失常、急性肾功能衰竭和重症监护病房住院时间显著减少(p<0.05)。两组的6个月、12个月、24个月和48个月生存率相似。在该研究中,两组间心绞痛改善程度和生活质量无显著差异。
在接受OPCAB的SLVD患者中使用术前IABP具有安全性和有效性。术前IABP与OPCAB联合使用可使SLVD患者实现完全血管重建,显著降低手术死亡率并取得优异的中期结果。