Ko M C H, Song M S, Edwards T, Lee H, Naughton N N
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0632, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Jul;310(1):169-76. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.061101. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
Pruritus (itch sensation) is a significant clinical problem. The aim of this study was to elucidate the roles of opioid receptor types and the site of action in opioid-induced itch in monkeys. Observers who were blinded to the conditions counted scratching after administration of various drugs. Intravenous (i.v.) administration of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists (fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil, and morphine) evoked scratching in a dose- and time-dependent manner. However, the kappa opioid agonist U-50488H [trans-(+/-)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide] and delta opioid agonist SNC80 [(+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-[2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl]-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] did not increase scratching. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of peptidic MOR agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO, 0.00032-0.01 mg) evoked scratching, but i.v. DAMGO (0.01-1 mg/kg) did not increase scratching. A similar difference between i.t. and i.v. effectiveness was seen with morphine. Antagonist studies revealed that i.v. administration of an opioid receptor antagonist (naltrexone, 0.0032-0.1 mg/kg) dose dependently attenuated scratching induced by i.v. fentanyl (0.018 mg/kg) or morphine (1 mg/kg). However, a peripherally selective opioid antagonist (quaternary naltrexone, 0.0032-0.32 mg/kg) did not block i.v. fentanyl- or morphine-induced scratching. Moreover, a histamine antagonist (diphenhydramine, 0.1-10 mg/kg), failed to attenuate scratching induced by i.t. morphine (0.032 mg) or i.v. morphine (1 mg/kg). Pretreatment with a selective MOR antagonist (clocinnamox, 0.1 mg/kg), but not kappa or delta opioid antagonists (nor-binaltorphimine or naltrindole), blocked i.t. morphine-induced scratching. Together, these data suggest that MOR, not other opioid receptor types or histamine, mediates scratching evoked by opioid analgesics. More important, this study provides in vivo pharmacological evidence that activation of central MOR plays an important role in opioid-induced itch in primates.
瘙痒(痒感)是一个重要的临床问题。本研究的目的是阐明阿片受体类型及其作用部位在猴子阿片类药物诱发瘙痒中的作用。对实验条件不知情的观察者对给予各种药物后的抓挠行为进行计数。静脉注射μ阿片受体(MOR)激动剂(芬太尼、阿芬太尼、瑞芬太尼和吗啡)以剂量和时间依赖性方式诱发抓挠。然而,κ阿片激动剂U-50488H [反式-(+/-)-3,4-二氯-N-甲基-N-(2-[1-吡咯烷基]-环己基)-苯乙酰胺] 和δ阿片激动剂SNC80 [(+)-4-[(αR)-α-[2S,5R)-4-烯丙基-2,5-二甲基-1-哌嗪基]-3-甲氧基苄基]-N,N-二乙苯甲酰胺] 并未增加抓挠行为。鞘内注射肽类MOR激动剂 [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-脑啡肽(DAMGO,0.00032 - 0.01 mg)诱发抓挠,但静脉注射DAMGO(0.01 - 1 mg/kg)并未增加抓挠行为。吗啡在鞘内和静脉注射的效果上也存在类似差异。拮抗剂研究表明,静脉注射阿片受体拮抗剂(纳曲酮,0.0032 - 0.1 mg/kg)剂量依赖性地减弱静脉注射芬太尼(0.018 mg/kg)或吗啡(1 mg/kg)诱发的抓挠。然而,外周选择性阿片拮抗剂(季铵化纳曲酮,0.0032 - 0.32 mg/kg)并未阻断静脉注射芬太尼或吗啡诱发的抓挠。此外,组胺拮抗剂(苯海拉明,0.1 - 10 mg/kg)未能减弱鞘内注射吗啡(0.032 mg)或静脉注射吗啡(1 mg/kg)诱发的抓挠。用选择性MOR拮抗剂(氯辛肟,0.1 mg/kg)预处理可阻断鞘内注射吗啡诱发的抓挠,而κ或δ阿片拮抗剂(去甲二丙诺啡或纳曲吲哚)则不能。总之,这些数据表明,介导阿片类镇痛药诱发抓挠的是MOR,而非其他阿片受体类型或组胺。更重要的是,本研究提供了体内药理学证据,表明中枢MOR的激活在灵长类动物阿片类药物诱发的瘙痒中起重要作用。