• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在改善基层医疗中缺血性心脏病管理数据记录的教育干预措施。

An educational intervention to improve data recording in the management of ischaemic heart disease in primary care.

作者信息

de Lusignan Simon, Hague Nigel, Brown Adrian, Majeed Azeem

机构信息

Primary Care Informatics, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):34-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh104.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdh104
PMID:15044571
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gaps in computerized medical records and a lack of a systematic approach to data recording make progress towards achieving quality standards in primary care difficult to demonstrate. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of an educational intervention on data quality in primary care.

METHODS

A before-and-after study of key data quality measures was carried out in 87 general practices in eight primary care organizations in England in phase 1 and 84 general practices in phase 2. The subjects were 19,470 patients with ischaemic heart disease in phase 1 and 19,784 patients in phase 2. The main outcome measures were improvement in the completeness and quality of the computerized medical record. Anonymized data were extracted from clinical information systems and processed to produce comparative information on each practice. Data quality workshops were arranged, in which reflection can take place, backed up by summary statistics. Practice visits provided training and personalized feedback of patients needing intervention.

RESULTS

In the patients with heart disease, nearly 16,000 new clinical entries were made in the key improvement areas. The percentage of patients advised to quit smoking increased by 49.3 per cent, from 23.6 per cent to 61.9 per cent. There were also significant improvements in many other aspects of management.

CONCLUSION

Focused interventions that provide targeted and relevant clinical information can be implemented in primary care. Such interventions can lead to a rise in data quality in primary care, but their effectiveness needs to be further tested in more rigorous research settings such as randomized controlled trials.

摘要

背景

电子病历存在缺陷,且缺乏系统的数据记录方法,这使得在初级医疗保健中实现质量标准的进展难以得到证明。本研究的目的是检验教育干预对初级医疗保健数据质量的影响。

方法

在第1阶段,对英格兰8个初级医疗保健机构中的87家全科诊所进行了关键数据质量指标的前后对照研究;在第2阶段,研究对象为84家全科诊所。第1阶段的受试者为19470例缺血性心脏病患者,第2阶段为19784例。主要结局指标是电子病历完整性和质量的改善。从临床信息系统中提取匿名数据并进行处理,以生成每家诊所的比较信息。安排了数据质量研讨会,会上可进行反思,并提供汇总统计数据作为支持。实地考察提供了培训以及针对需要干预患者的个性化反馈。

结果

在心脏病患者中,关键改善领域新增了近16000条临床记录。建议戒烟的患者比例从23.6%增至61.9%,增幅为49.3%。在管理的许多其他方面也有显著改善。

结论

在初级医疗保健中可实施提供有针对性和相关性临床信息的重点干预措施。此类干预措施可提高初级医疗保健中的数据质量,但其有效性需要在更严格的研究环境(如随机对照试验)中进一步检验。

相似文献

1
An educational intervention to improve data recording in the management of ischaemic heart disease in primary care.一项旨在改善基层医疗中缺血性心脏病管理数据记录的教育干预措施。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):34-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh104.
2
Management of ischaemic heart disease in primary care: towards better practice. STaRNet. South Thames Region Network.基层医疗中缺血性心脏病的管理:迈向更佳实践。STaRNet。南泰晤士地区网络。
J Public Health Med. 1999 Jun;21(2):179-84. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.2.179.
3
EHRs fix everything--and nine other myths.电子健康记录能解决一切问题——以及其他九个误区。
Fam Pract Manag. 2007 Mar;14(3):26-30.
4
Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting.门诊护理环境中医疗记录文档的质量及其相关因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec 10;2(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-22.
5
An educational intervention, involving feedback of routinely collected computer data, to improve cardiovascular disease management in UK primary care.一项教育干预措施,涉及对常规收集的计算机数据进行反馈,以改善英国初级医疗保健中的心血管疾病管理。
Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(1):57-62.
6
A computerized system for reviewing medical records from physicians' offices.一种用于审查医生办公室病历的计算机化系统。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Dec;20(12):679-94. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30117-1.
7
Managing heart failure in primary care: first steps in implementing the National Service Framework.基层医疗中的心衰管理:实施《国家服务框架》的初步措施
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):42-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh102.
8
The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.基层医疗中记录保存的质量:计算机化系统、纸质系统和混合系统的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):929-33; discussion 933.
9
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
10
Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.能否从全科医疗计算机记录中识别出那些本应从国家老年人服务框架实施中受益的骨质疏松症患者?一项初步研究揭示了计算机化医疗记录的变异性以及检索这些记录存在的问题。
Public Health. 2003 Nov;117(6):438-45. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00129-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine Health Information System (RHIS) improvements for strengthened health system management.通过改进常规卫生信息系统(RHIS)加强卫生系统管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 13;8(8):CD012012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012012.pub2.
2
Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善基层医疗保健中电子病历使用情况的干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 May;26(1):0. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000023.
3
Identifying musculoskeletal conditions in electronic medical records: a prevalence and validation study using the Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) database.
在电子病历中识别肌肉骨骼疾病:一项使用初级医疗保健信息传递(DELPHI)数据库的患病率及验证研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 3;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2568-2.
4
Improving the quality of EHR recording in primary care: a data quality feedback tool.提高基层医疗中电子健康记录的质量:一种数据质量反馈工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):81-87. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw054. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
What drives quality improvement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care: process evaluation of the Quality Improvement in Chronic Kidney Disease (QICKD) trial.推动初级保健中慢性肾脏病(CKD)质量改进的因素:慢性肾脏病质量改进(QICKD)试验的过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 6;6(4):e008480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008480.
6
Data discipline in electronic medical records: Improving smoking status documentation with a standardized intake tool and process.电子病历中的数据规范:使用标准化的录入工具和流程改善吸烟状况记录
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Dec;61(12):e570-6.
7
Improving the management of people with a family history of breast cancer in primary care: before and after study of audit-based education.改善初级保健中具有乳腺癌家族史人群的管理:基于审核的教育前后研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jul 24;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-105.
8
Audit-based education lowers systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the Quality Improvement in CKD (QICKD) trial results.基于审核的教育可降低慢性肾脏病患者的收缩压:QICKD 试验结果。
Kidney Int. 2013 Sep;84(3):609-20. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.96. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
9
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
10
Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.心血管健康差异:医疗保健干预措施的系统评价
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Oct;64(5 Suppl):29S-100S. doi: 10.1177/1077558707305416.