Suppr超能文献

基于审核的教育可降低慢性肾脏病患者的收缩压:QICKD 试验结果。

Audit-based education lowers systolic blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the Quality Improvement in CKD (QICKD) trial results.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2013 Sep;84(3):609-20. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.96. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

Abstract

Strict control of systolic blood pressure is known to slow progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here we compared audit-based education (ABE) to guidelines and prompts or usual practice in lowering systolic blood pressure in people with CKD. This 2-year cluster randomized trial included 93 volunteer general practices randomized into three arms with 30 ABE practices, 32 with guidelines and prompts, and 31 usual practices. An intervention effect on the primary outcome, systolic blood pressure, was calculated using a multilevel model to predict changes after the intervention. The prevalence of CKD was 7.29% (41,183 of 565,016 patients) with all cardiovascular comorbidities more common in those with CKD. Our models showed that the systolic blood pressure was significantly lowered by 2.41 mm Hg (CI 0.59-4.29 mm Hg), in the ABE practices with an odds ratio of achieving at least a 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure of 1.24 (CI 1.05-1.45). Practices exposed to guidelines and prompts produced no significant change compared to usual practice. Male gender, ABE, ischemic heart disease, and congestive heart failure were independently associated with a greater lowering of systolic blood pressure but the converse applied to hypertension and age over 75 years. There were no reports of harm. Thus, individuals receiving ABE are more likely to achieve a lower blood pressure than those receiving only usual practice. The findings should be interpreted with caution due to the wide confidence intervals.

摘要

严格控制收缩压已知可减缓慢性肾脏病(CKD)的进展。在这里,我们比较了基于审核的教育(ABE)与指南和提示或常规实践在降低 CKD 患者收缩压方面的效果。这项为期 2 年的聚类随机试验纳入了 93 家志愿综合实践,随机分为三组,每组 30 家接受 ABE 实践,32 家接受指南和提示,31 家采用常规实践。使用多水平模型计算了初级结局(收缩压)的干预效果,以预测干预后的变化。CKD 的患病率为 7.29%(41183 例/565016 例患者),所有心血管合并症在 CKD 患者中更为常见。我们的模型显示,ABE 实践组的收缩压显著降低了 2.41mmHg(CI 0.59-4.29mmHg),达到收缩压至少降低 5mmHg 的可能性比常规实践组高 1.24 倍(CI 1.05-1.45)。与常规实践相比,接受指南和提示的实践并没有产生显著的变化。男性、ABE、缺血性心脏病和充血性心力衰竭与收缩压降低幅度更大独立相关,但高血压和年龄超过 75 岁则相反。没有出现危害报告。因此,接受 ABE 的个体比仅接受常规实践的个体更有可能实现更低的血压。由于置信区间较宽,应谨慎解释这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/3778715/44ad349fa2f7/ki201396f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验