• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗所需人数需要一个相关的概率估计。

The number needed to treat needs an associated odds estimation.

作者信息

Aino Hiroshi, Yanagisawa Shinichiro, Kamae Isao

机构信息

Division of Health Informatics and Sciences, Research Center for Urban Safety and Security, and Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuou-ku, Kobe, Japan 650-0017.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):84-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh101.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdh101
PMID:15044581
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number needed to treat (NNT) is a practically useful indicator that represents how many patients must be treated to prevent one adverse event when provided with a new intervention instead of the standard one. The NNT associates the net-benefit of an experimental treatment with the number of patients, or the size of trials, expecting one outcome of success. The NNT, however, also suggests that we assume an implicit execution of independent Bernouilli trials--as it were, the hypothetical NNT trials--independently repeated the same number of times as the value of NNT and with the same occurrence-probability of success as the value of absolute risk reduction. These independent Bernouilli trials, of course, have some probabilities of failure. Most decision-makers in practice would be more interested in how much the hypothetical NNT trials can achieve 'success/failure' with 'how many' patients, or the 'odds' of success versus failure, rather than 'one' outcome of success as the mean value.

METHODS

We investigated the properties of hypothetical NNT trials. A binomial distribution was employed to develop formulae for estimating the odds of success versus failure to gain net-benefit in the NNT-associated trials.

RESULTS

Most of the estimates of odds expected by the new intervention are between three and 1.72, converging to e-1 as the NNT increases.

CONCLUSION

When basing decisions on an NNT, clinicians and public health specialists should take account of the odds of achieving the theoretical NNT.

摘要

背景

需治疗人数(NNT)是一个实用的指标,它表示在采用新干预措施而非标准干预措施时,必须治疗多少患者才能预防一例不良事件。NNT将实验性治疗的净效益与预期获得一次成功结果的患者数量或试验规模联系起来。然而,NNT还意味着我们假设进行了独立的伯努利试验——可以说,是假设的NNT试验——独立重复的次数与NNT的值相同,且成功发生概率与绝对风险降低的值相同。当然,这些独立的伯努利试验存在一定的失败概率。实际上,大多数决策者更感兴趣的是假设的NNT试验用“多少”患者能够实现“成功/失败”,即成功与失败的“几率”,而不是将一次成功结果作为均值。

方法

我们研究了假设的NNT试验的特性。采用二项分布来推导公式,以估计在与NNT相关的试验中获得净效益的成功与失败几率。

结果

新干预措施预期的大多数几率估计值在3到1.72之间,随着NNT的增加收敛于e - 1。

结论

在基于NNT做出决策时,临床医生和公共卫生专家应考虑实现理论NNT的几率。

相似文献

1
The number needed to treat needs an associated odds estimation.治疗所需人数需要一个相关的概率估计。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):84-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh101.
2
Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.比较研究中疾病风险绝对指标的解读。
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):432-5.
3
The number remaining at risk: an adjunct to the number needed to treat.仍处于风险中的人数:治疗所需人数的一个辅助指标。
Can J Cardiol. 2002 Mar;18(3):254-8.
4
Number needed to treat: easily understood and intuitively meaningful? Theoretical considerations and a randomized trial.需治疗人数:易于理解且直观有意义?理论思考与一项随机试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Sep;55(9):888-92. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00432-8.
5
Evidence-based evaluation of benefits in therapeutic interventions: methodologically controlled and non-randomly assigned reflections on the number needed to treat.治疗性干预措施效益的循证评估:关于治疗所需人数的方法学控制及非随机分配思考
Ital Heart J. 2003 Feb;4(2):80-3.
6
How effective is that treatment? The number needed to treat.那种治疗方法的效果如何?需治疗人数。
Tex Dent J. 2011 Feb;128(2):211-9.
7
Number needed to treat is incorrect without proper time-related considerations.不考虑适当的时间相关因素,所需治疗人数的计算是不正确的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;65(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
8
Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.在慢性病治疗所需人数的计算中,发现年化率比绝对风险降低率更优。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
9
Number needed to treat and number needed to harm are not the best way to report and assess the results of randomised clinical trials.需治疗人数和需伤害人数并非报告和评估随机临床试验结果的最佳方式。
Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;146(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07707.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
10
When should an effective treatment be used? Derivation of the threshold number needed to treat and the minimum event rate for treatment.何时应使用有效治疗方法?治疗所需阈值数量和治疗最小事件发生率的推导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00347-x.