Morikawa Yoshiro, Kitazato Miyoshi, Mitsuyama Junichi, Mizunaga Shingo, Minami Shinzaburo, Watanabe Yasuo
Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Apr;48(4):1229-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1229-1234.2004.
The in vitro activities of piperacillin (PIP) against beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin (AMP)-resistant (BLNAR) Haemophilus influenzae were compared with those of cefotaxime (CTX) and ceftriaxone (CRO), and the potency of PIP as therapy for meningitis caused by BLNAR is also discussed. PIP showed good activity (MIC at which 90% of strains are inhibited, 0.25 micro g/ml) against 69 BLNAR strains, and its activity was comparable to that of CRO and superior to that of CTX. No significant correlation was observed between the MICs of PIP and CTX or CRO or AMP, whereas a high correlation was observed between the MICs of CTX and CRO. In the killing study, PIP showed potent bactericidal activity compared with those of CTX and CRO. By microscopic examination, PIP caused the formation of a spindle and short filamentous cells with bulges and induced cell lysis in BLNAR strains, while treatment with CTX and CRO resulted in the formation of large, spherical cells without any obvious lysis. The affinity of Bocillin FL, a fluorescent penicillin used for determination of the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)s) for penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), to PBPs 3a and 3b of BLNAR strains was drastically decreased compared with that to an AMP-susceptible strain (ATCC 33391). In the case of the BLNAR strains, the IC(50)s for PBPs 1a, 1b, and 2 were similar to those for the PBPs of ATCC 33391. Since the affinity of binding to PBPs 3a and 3b of the BLNAR strains decreased drastically, the second targets among the PBPs were PBP 2 for PIP, PBP1 (1a and 1b) for CTX and CRO. In conclusion, PIP showed excellent activities against BLNAR strains in a manner different from those of cephem antibiotics, suggesting that it could be a candidate therapeutic agent for the treatment of meningitis caused by BLNAR strains.
将哌拉西林(PIP)对β-内酰胺酶阴性氨苄西林(AMP)耐药(BLNAR)流感嗜血杆菌的体外活性与头孢噻肟(CTX)和头孢曲松(CRO)进行了比较,并讨论了PIP作为治疗BLNAR所致脑膜炎的效力。PIP对69株BLNAR菌株显示出良好活性(90%菌株被抑制时的MIC,0.25μg/ml),其活性与CRO相当且优于CTX。未观察到PIP与CTX或CRO或AMP的MIC之间存在显著相关性,而CTX与CRO的MIC之间存在高度相关性。在杀菌研究中,与CTX和CRO相比,PIP显示出强大的杀菌活性。通过显微镜检查,PIP导致BLNAR菌株形成带有凸起的纺锤形和短丝状细胞并诱导细胞裂解,而用CTX和CRO处理则导致形成大的球形细胞且无明显裂解。用于测定青霉素结合蛋白(PBPs)的50%抑制浓度(IC50)的荧光青霉素Bocillin FL对BLNAR菌株的PBPs 3a和3b的亲和力与对AMP敏感菌株(ATCC 33391)相比大幅降低。对于BLNAR菌株,PBPs 1a、1b和2的IC50与ATCC 33391的PBPs相似。由于与BLNAR菌株的PBPs 3a和3b的结合亲和力大幅降低,PIP的PBPs中的第二个靶点是PBP 2,CTX和CRO的是PBP1(1a和1b)。总之,PIP以不同于头孢菌素类抗生素的方式对BLNAR菌株显示出优异活性,表明它可能是治疗BLNAR菌株所致脑膜炎的候选治疗药物。