Ryan Edmond A, Shandro Tami, Green Kristy, Paty Breay W, Senior Peter A, Bigam David, Shapiro A M James, Vantyghem Marie-Christine
Department of Medicine, Clinical Islet Transplant Program, University of Alberta and Capital Health Authority, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Diabetes. 2004 Apr;53(4):955-62. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.955.
Currently, the major indications for solitary islet transplantation are recurrent severe hypoglycemia and labile glucose control. Quantifying these problems remains subjective. We have developed a scoring system for both hypoglycemia and glycemic lability, established normative data, and used them in patients who have undergone islet transplantation. A composite hypoglycemic score (HYPO score) was devised based on the frequency, severity, and degree of unawareness of the hypoglycemia. In addition, using 4 weeks of glucose records, a lability index (LI) was calculated based on the change in glucose levels over time and compared with a clinical assessment of glycemic lability. A mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) was also calculated based on 2 consecutive days of seven readings each day. These scores were determined in 100 randomly selected subjects with type 1 diabetes from our general clinic to serve as a control group and in patients before and after islet transplantation. The mean age of the control diabetic subjects was 38.4 +/- 1.3 years (+/-SE), with a duration of diabetes of 21.5 +/- 1.1 years. The median HYPO score in the control subjects was 143 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 46-423). The LI in the diabetic control subjects was 223 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 130-329 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1)). The LI correlated much more closely than the MAGE with the clinical assessment of lability. A HYPO score of > or = 1,047 (90th percentile) or an LI > or = 433 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1) (90th percentile) indicated serious problems with hypoglycemia or glycemic lability, respectively. The islet transplant patients (n = 51) were 42.1 +/- 1.4 years old, with a duration of diabetes of 25.7 +/- 1.4 years. Islet transplant patients had a mean HYPO score of 1,234 +/- 184 pretransplant, which was significantly higher than that of the control subjects (P < 0.001), which became negligible posttransplantation with the elimination of hypoglycemia. The median LI pretransplant was 497 mmol/l(2)/h.week(-1) (25th to 75th interquartile range: 330-692), significantly higher than that of control subjects (P < 0.001), and fell to 40 (25th to 75th interquartile range: 14-83) within a month after the final transplant. In those who had lost graft function, the LI rose again. The HYPO score and LI provide measures of the extent of problems with hypoglycemia and glycemic lability, respectively, complement the clinical assessment of the problems with glucose control before islet transplantation, and will allow comparison of selection of subjects for transplants between centers.
目前,孤立胰岛移植的主要适应证是复发性严重低血糖症和血糖控制不稳定。对这些问题进行量化仍然具有主观性。我们针对低血糖症和血糖不稳定情况开发了一种评分系统,建立了标准数据,并将其应用于接受胰岛移植的患者。基于低血糖症的发生频率、严重程度和未察觉程度设计了一个综合低血糖评分(HYPO评分)。此外,利用4周的血糖记录,根据血糖水平随时间的变化计算出一个不稳定指数(LI),并与血糖不稳定的临床评估结果进行比较。还根据连续2天每天7次读数计算出血糖波动平均幅度(MAGE)。在我们普通门诊随机选取100例1型糖尿病患者作为对照组,测定这些评分,并在胰岛移植患者移植前后进行测定。糖尿病对照组受试者的平均年龄为38.4±1.3岁(±标准误),糖尿病病程为21.5±1.1年。对照组受试者的HYPO评分中位数为143(第25至75百分位数区间:46 - 423)。糖尿病对照组受试者的LI为223(第25至75百分位数区间:130 - 329 mmol/l(2)/h·周(-1))。LI与不稳定的临床评估结果的相关性比MAGE更为密切。HYPO评分≥1047(第90百分位数)或LI≥433 mmol/l(2)/h·周(-1)(第90百分位数)分别表明存在严重的低血糖症或血糖不稳定问题。胰岛移植患者(n = 51)年龄为42.1±1.4岁,糖尿病病程为25.7±1.4年。胰岛移植患者移植前的平均HYPO评分为1234±184,显著高于对照组受试者(P < 0.001),移植后随着低血糖症的消除该评分变得微不足道。移植前LI的中位数为497 mmol/l(2)/h·周(-1)(第25至75百分位数区间:330 - 692),显著高于对照组受试者(P < 0.001),在最后一次移植后1个月内降至40(第25至75百分位数区间:14 - 83)。在移植胰岛失去功能的患者中,LI再次升高。HYPO评分和LI分别提供了低血糖症和血糖不稳定问题严重程度的衡量指标,补充了胰岛移植前血糖控制问题的临床评估,并且将有助于各中心之间对移植受试者选择情况进行比较。