Kniest F M, Wolfs B J, Vos H, Ducheine B O, van Schayk-Bakker M J, de Lange P J, Vos E M, van Bronswijk J E
Interuniversity Task Group Home and Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1992 Jul;22(7):681-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00191.x.
We report on the mechanisms, the environmental changes and patient compliance with regard to conventional and new dust and mite avoidance measures to prevent allergic symptoms caused by mite allergens, taking into account both allergen contamination and the developmental success of pyroglyphid Acari. Twenty patients with persisting rhinitic complaints were selected and matched. Although the patients had performed some conventional dust and mite avoidance measures (patient compliance was 90%), the dwellings proved to be a stimulus for mite development. Moisture problems due to faulty construction and excessive moisture production were common. Since humidity conditions could not be changed at short notice, the 20 homes were subjected to the new variants of mite allergen avoidance based on intensive cleaning without (control) and with an acaricide incorporated (acaricidal cleaner [Acarosan]). After the carrying out of conventional avoidance measures, these patients still had allergic symptoms, and dust from only 23 to 52% of their textile objects was under the proposed guanine (mite faeces indicator) risk level. Only the acaricidal cleaner was able to decrease the allergenic mite load (and the burden of the patients) significantly in this 12 month period. With respect to mite-extermination, acaricidal cleaning was 88% better than intensive cleaning. Reduction of guanine was 38% better in the Acarosan treatment group. Clinical results have been reported elsewhere. A significant difference in favour of the acaricidal cleaning was seen in both subjective (as regards symptoms) and in objective data (total IgE). Another 50 patients were questioned.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们报告了关于传统及新型尘螨规避措施的机制、环境变化以及患者依从性,旨在预防螨过敏原引发的过敏症状,同时考虑到过敏原污染及粉螨发育情况。选取并匹配了20名患有持续性鼻炎症状的患者。尽管患者已采取一些传统的尘螨规避措施(患者依从性为90%),但居住环境仍是螨发育的诱因。因建筑缺陷和过多水分产生导致的潮湿问题很常见。由于湿度条件无法短期内改变,这20户家庭接受了基于深度清洁的新型螨过敏原规避措施,一组不使用(对照组),另一组添加杀螨剂(杀螨清洁剂[Acarosan])。在采取传统规避措施后,这些患者仍有过敏症状,其纺织品中仅有23%至52%的灰尘处于建议的鸟嘌呤(螨粪便指标)风险水平以下。在这12个月期间,只有杀螨清洁剂能够显著降低致敏螨负荷(以及患者的负担)。在灭螨方面,杀螨清洁比深度清洁效果好88%。Acarosan治疗组鸟嘌呤减少量高38%。临床结果已在其他地方报道。在主观(症状方面)和客观数据(总IgE)上均观察到杀螨清洁具有显著优势。另外对50名患者进行了询问。(摘要截选至250字)