Suppr超能文献

聚焦镇痛和全身放松在应对逐渐增强的刺激强度时会产生不同的催眠镇痛效果。

Focused analgesia and generalized relaxation produce differential hypnotic analgesia in response to ascending stimulus intensity.

作者信息

Sharav Yair, Tal Michael

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, P.O. Box 1172, Jerusalem 91010, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 Apr;52(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.10.001.

Abstract

This study was designed in order to examine the effects of different types of hypnotic suggestion on hypnotic analgesia. Generalized relaxation and focused analgesia were induced in seven high-hypnotizable (HH) and eight low-hypnotizable (LH) subjects. Subjects were not aware to which group they belonged. The two groups did not differ in their expectation rates to achieve analgesia under hypnosis. Pain intensity and unpleasantness were rated on visual analogue scales in response to painful electrical stimuli, delivered in random order in five ascending intensities. Both focused analgesia and generalized relaxation decreased pain intensity significantly (P < 0.01). However, stimulus-intensity response curves differed under the two hypnotic conditions. As stimulus intensity became higher pain reduction was enhanced under focused analgesia, while a constant reduction occurred under generalized relaxation. The interaction between hypnotic state and stimulus intensity was significant for focused analgesia (P < 0.05) but not for generalized relaxation (P > 0.07), difference became more pronounced when analyzed for HH subjects only (P < 0.002 for analgesia, P > 0.10 for relaxation). Pain reduction was significantly higher in HH than in LH subjects under focused analgesia (P < 0.02) but not under generalized relaxation (P > 0.5). We conclude that by utilizing two modes of hypnotic suggestions in response to ascending stimuli, we were able to discover two components of hypnotic analgesia. One shows a parallel shift in the stimulus-response function, has features similar to placebo and bears no clear relationship to hypnotic susceptibility. The other shows a slope change in the stimulus-response curve and has a positive relationship to hypnotic susceptibility.

摘要

本研究旨在考察不同类型的催眠暗示对催眠镇痛的影响。对7名高催眠易感性(HH)受试者和8名低催眠易感性(LH)受试者诱导产生全身放松和聚焦镇痛。受试者不知道自己所属的组别。两组在催眠状态下实现镇痛的期望率没有差异。针对以随机顺序施加的五种递增强度的疼痛电刺激,通过视觉模拟量表对疼痛强度和不愉快程度进行评分。聚焦镇痛和全身放松均显著降低了疼痛强度(P<0.01)。然而,在两种催眠条件下刺激强度-反应曲线有所不同。随着刺激强度升高,聚焦镇痛下的疼痛减轻增强,而全身放松下疼痛减轻保持恒定。催眠状态与刺激强度之间的相互作用在聚焦镇痛时显著(P<0.05),而在全身放松时不显著(P>0.07),仅对HH受试者进行分析时差异更为明显(镇痛时P<0.002,放松时P>0.10)。在聚焦镇痛下,HH受试者的疼痛减轻显著高于LH受试者(P<0.02),而在全身放松下则不然(P>0.5)。我们得出结论,通过针对递增刺激采用两种催眠暗示模式,我们能够发现催眠镇痛的两个组成部分。一个表现为刺激-反应函数的平行移动,具有类似于安慰剂的特征,且与催眠易感性无明确关系。另一个表现为刺激-反应曲线的斜率变化,与催眠易感性呈正相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验