Gaffney E A
The school of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J Math Biol. 2004 Apr;48(4):375-422. doi: 10.1007/s00285-003-0246-2. Epub 2003 Oct 27.
In this paper simple models for tumour growth incorporating age-structured cell cycle dynamics are considered in the presence of two non-cross-resistant S-phase specific chemotherapeutic drugs. According to the seminal work of Goldie and Coldman, if one cannot deliver two cell cycle phase non-specific, non-cross-resistant drugs simultaneously, for example due to toxicity, and both drugs are identical apart from resistance, one should alternate their delivery as rapidly as possible. However consider S-phase specific drugs. One might speculate that, for example, alternating the two drugs at intervals of T, where T is the mean cell cycle time, is better than alternating the drugs at intervals of T/2, as the latter strategy allows the possibility of a cell cycle sanctuary. Such speculation implicitly requires a sufficiently low variance of the cell cycle time, and hence it is not clear if such reasoning prevents a generalisation of the results of Goldie and Coldman. This question is addressed in this paper via a detailed modelling investigation, as motivated by suggestions for future colorectal adjuvant chemotherapy trials and developments in hepatic arterial infusion technology. It is shown that the cell cycle distribution of the resistant cell populations is strongly influenced by the chemotherapy schedule. The consequences of this can be dramatic, and can lead to chemotherapy failure at resonant chemotherapy timings, especially for a small standard deviation of the cell cycle time. The novel aspects of this observation are highlighted compared to other models in the literature exhibiting resonant behaviour in the timing of a periodic chemotherapy protocol. The above investigation also results in the principal prediction of this paper that reducing the drug alternation time to approximately a few hours, if possible, can result in substantial improvements in predicted chemotherapy outcomes. Critically, such improvements are not predicted by the Goldie Coldman model or other chemotherapy scheduling models in the literature.
本文考虑了在存在两种非交叉耐药的S期特异性化疗药物的情况下,纳入年龄结构细胞周期动力学的肿瘤生长简单模型。根据戈尔迪和戈德曼的开创性工作,如果由于毒性等原因不能同时给予两种细胞周期非特异性、非交叉耐药的药物,且两种药物除耐药性外相同,那么应该尽可能快地交替给药。然而,考虑S期特异性药物。例如,有人可能推测,以T为间隔交替使用这两种药物(其中T是平均细胞周期时间)比以T/2为间隔交替使用药物更好,因为后一种策略存在细胞周期庇护所的可能性。这种推测隐含地要求细胞周期时间的方差足够低,因此不清楚这种推理是否会妨碍戈尔迪和戈德曼结果的推广。本文通过详细的建模研究解决了这个问题,这是受未来结直肠癌辅助化疗试验的建议和肝动脉灌注技术发展的推动。结果表明,耐药细胞群体的细胞周期分布受化疗方案的强烈影响。其后果可能很严重,并可能导致在共振化疗时机出现化疗失败,特别是对于细胞周期时间标准差较小的情况。与文献中其他在周期性化疗方案时机表现出共振行为的模型相比,突出了这一观察结果的新颖之处。上述研究还得出了本文的主要预测,即如果可能的话,将药物交替时间缩短至大约几个小时,可以显著改善预测的化疗结果。至关重要的是,戈尔迪 - 戈德曼模型或文献中的其他化疗调度模型并未预测到这种改善。