Giuliani A, Caporale A, Di Bari M, Demoro M, Gozzo P, Corona M, Miccini M, Ricciardulli T, Tocchi A
Dept. of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec;22(4):531-8.
It was suggested that there are no stronger prognostic factors in gastric cancer than nodal involvement or depth of wall invasion. The present paper evaluated the influence of maximum tumor diameter (MTD) value, measured on fixed resected specimens, on the extent of disease progression and the outcome in gastric cancer patients. Clinicopathological data were retrospectively retrieved from records of 122 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. The patients' MTD values were grouped as follows: MTD1, up to 26 mm; MTD2, between 26 and 50 mm; and MTD3, over 50 mm. The three groups evidenced significant differences with regard to 5 year survival (MTD1: 54%, MTD2: 31%, MTD3: 20%; p = 0.00027), furthermore they were significantly different with respect to the type of gastrectomy (p = 0.021), depth wall invasion (p = 0.000), lymphatic microinvasion (p = 0.014), perineural microinvasion (p = 0.017), stromal reaction (p = 0.025), and stage (p = 0.035). ROC curve analysis individuated a best accurate MTD threshold value for nodal involvement of 32 mm (sensitivity = 56.6%; specificity = 60.9%; positive predictive value = 52.6%; negative predictive value = 64.6%). The logistic regression analysis suggested that the depth of wall invasion was the only independent variable associated with MTD value (p = 0.0005). Multivariate analysis showed that independent prognostic risk factors were sex (p < 0.0025), number of involved nodes (p < 0.001) and MTD (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the maximum tumor diameter value of gastric cancer may be a factor with greater prognostic implications than previously believed.
有人认为,在胃癌中,没有比淋巴结受累或壁浸润深度更强的预后因素。本文评估了在固定切除标本上测量的最大肿瘤直径(MTD)值对胃癌患者疾病进展程度和预后的影响。从122例行根治性胃切除术患者的记录中回顾性检索临床病理数据。患者的MTD值分组如下:MTD1,≤26mm;MTD2,26至50mm;MTD3,>50mm。三组在5年生存率方面有显著差异(MTD1:54%,MTD2:31%,MTD3:20%;p = 0.00027),此外,在胃切除类型(p = 0.021)、壁浸润深度(p = 0.000)、淋巴微浸润(p = 0.014)、神经周围微浸润(p = 0.017)、间质反应(p = 0.025)和分期(p = 0.035)方面也有显著差异。ROC曲线分析确定淋巴结受累的最佳准确MTD阈值为32mm(敏感性 = 56.6%;特异性 = 60.9%;阳性预测值 = 52.6%;阴性预测值 = 64.6%)。逻辑回归分析表明,壁浸润深度是与MTD值相关的唯一独立变量(p = 0.0005)。多因素分析显示,独立的预后危险因素为性别(p < 0.0025)、受累淋巴结数量(p < 0.001)和MTD(p < 0.001)。总之,胃癌的最大肿瘤直径值可能是一个比先前认为的具有更大预后意义的因素。