Harris Catherine L, Morris Alison L
Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Apr;30(2):305-18. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.305.
Theorists have predicted that repetition blindness (RB) should be absent for nonwords because they do not activate preexisting mental types. The authors hypothesized that RB would be observed for nonwords because RB can occur at a sublexical level. Four experiments showed that RB is observed for word-nonword pairs (noon noof), orthographically similar nonwords (glome glame), and identical repetitions (plass plass). More RB was found for words than for nonwords. Prior researchers may have failed to find RB for nonwords because display conditions that allow 2 words to be reliably encoded are insufficient for nonwords, or because observers coped with low ability to encode nonwords by using guessing strategies that do not require creating a mental type or tokenizing it.
理论家预测,对于非词而言不应存在重复盲视(RB)现象,因为它们不会激活预先存在的心理类型。作者们提出假设,认为对于非词也会观察到重复盲视现象,因为重复盲视可能在次词汇层面发生。四项实验表明,对于单词 - 非词对(noon noof)、拼写相似的非词(glome glame)以及相同重复(plass plass)都观察到了重复盲视现象。相比非词,单词的重复盲视现象更明显。先前的研究人员可能未能在非词中发现重复盲视现象,原因可能是能够可靠编码两个单词的显示条件对于非词而言并不充分,或者是因为观察者通过使用无需创建心理类型或对其进行标记化的猜测策略来应对编码非词能力较低的情况。