• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国实现高质量且负担得起的医疗保健——一个可实现的目标。

High-quality, affordable healthcare in the United States--an achievable goal.

作者信息

Barton Glen A

机构信息

Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Front Health Serv Manage. 2004 Spring;20(3):13-21.

PMID:15055827
Abstract

We have evidence that quality and efficiency work together for better healthcare processes for patients while providing cost savings for employers. The complex processes and frequent disconnects among providers who care for the same patients are obviously an area of opportunity for improvement. By standardizing processes for care, we can begin to effectively measure quality and efficiency throughout the value chain. When we work as a team, focusing on quality and measurement, we can look to a future when the best possible care is efficiently and effectively delivered to patients. The future will also be brighter for employers dedicated to providing high-quality, competitive benefits for their valued employees and retirees while maintaining profitability.

摘要

我们有证据表明,质量和效率共同作用,可为患者带来更好的医疗保健流程,同时为雇主节省成本。照顾同一患者的医疗服务提供者之间复杂的流程和频繁的脱节显然是一个有待改进的领域。通过规范护理流程,我们可以开始在整个价值链中有效地衡量质量和效率。当我们作为一个团队,专注于质量和衡量时,我们可以展望这样一个未来:将尽可能最好的护理高效且有效地提供给患者。对于致力于为其重要员工和退休人员提供高质量、有竞争力福利同时保持盈利能力的雇主来说,未来也将更加光明。

相似文献

1
High-quality, affordable healthcare in the United States--an achievable goal.在美国实现高质量且负担得起的医疗保健——一个可实现的目标。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2004 Spring;20(3):13-21.
2
Managing implementation: the unanswered question.管理实施:未解决的问题。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2004 Spring;20(3):29-36; discussion 41.
3
Managing health and welfare plans instead of letting them manage you.
Benefits Q. 1997;13(1):32-40.
4
IBM's pursuit of quality and cost-effective health benefits.IBM对优质且具成本效益的健康福利的追求。
Manag Care Q. 1996 Winter;4(1):59-66.
5
Between a rock and a hard place: understanding the employer mind-set.进退两难:理解雇主的思维模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):1548-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1548.
6
Quality vs. costs? A survey of healthcare purchasing habits and concerns.
Healthc Financ Manage. 2000 Jul;54(7):68-73.
7
Employers.雇主
State Health Care Am. 1994:58-62.
8
Can payment incentives improve quality and efficiency of care?支付激励措施能否提高医疗服务的质量和效率?
QA Rev. 1989 Nov;1(4):1, 8.
9
Towers Perrin's outlook: what employers (and providers) need to know about defined contribution health plans.韬睿惠悦的观点:雇主(及供应商)需要了解的关于定额供款健康计划的内容。
Manag Care Q. 2002 Spring;10(2):9-12.
10
Standing at the crossroads. The employer has a role in fostering quality improvement.
Healthplan. 1999 Jul-Aug;40(4):15-6, 18.