Gilmer Todd P, Dolder Christian R, Lacro Jonathan P, Folsom David P, Lindamer Laurie, Garcia Piedad, Jeste Dilip V
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0622, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;161(4):692-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.692.
The authors' goal was to evaluate the relationship between adherence to treatment with antipsychotic medication and health expenditures. A secondary objective was to identify risk factors predictive of nonadherence.
Data included Medicaid eligibility and claims data from 1998 to 2000 for San Diego County, Calif. Pharmacy records were used to assess adherence to treatment with antipsychotic medication according to the cumulative possession ratio (the number of days medications were available for consumption divided by the number of days subjects were eligible for Medi-Cal). Regression models were used to examine risk factors, hospitalizations, and costs associated with nonadherence, partial adherence, adherence, and excess fills of antipsychotic medication.
Forty-one percent of Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia were found to be adherent to treatment with their antipsychotic medications: 24% were nonadherent, 16% were partially adherent, and 19% were excess fillers. Rates of psychiatric hospitalization were lower for those who were adherent (14%) than for those who were nonadherent (35%), partially adherent (24%), or had excess fills (25%). Rates of medical hospitalization were lower for those who were adherent (7%) than for those who were nonadherent (13%) or had excess fills (12%). Those who were adherent had significantly lower hospital costs than the other groups; pharmacy costs were higher among those who were adherent than among those who were nonadherent or partially adherent and were highest for excess fillers. Total costs for excess fillers (14,044 US dollars) were substantially higher than total costs for any other group.
Despite the widespread use of atypical antipsychotic medications, alarmingly high rates of both underuse and excessive filling of antipsychotic prescriptions were found in Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia. The high rates of antipsychotic nonadherence and associated negative consequences suggest interventions on multiple levels.
作者的目标是评估抗精神病药物治疗依从性与医疗费用之间的关系。次要目标是确定预测不依从的风险因素。
数据包括加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县1998年至2000年的医疗补助资格和理赔数据。药房记录用于根据累积持有率(可用于消费的药物天数除以受试者符合医疗补助资格的天数)评估抗精神病药物治疗的依从性。回归模型用于检查与抗精神病药物不依从、部分依从、依从和过量配药相关的风险因素、住院情况和费用。
发现患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人中,41%坚持使用抗精神病药物治疗:24%不依从,16%部分依从,19%过量配药。依从者的精神科住院率(14%)低于不依从者(35%)、部分依从者(24%)或过量配药者(25%)。依从者的内科住院率(7%)低于不依从者(13%)或过量配药者(12%)。依从者的住院费用明显低于其他组;依从者的药房费用高于不依从者或部分依从者,过量配药者的药房费用最高。过量配药者的总费用(14,044美元)大大高于其他任何组的总费用。
尽管非典型抗精神病药物广泛使用,但在患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人中,抗精神病药物处方的未充分使用和过量配药率高得惊人。抗精神病药物不依从率高及其相关负面后果表明需要进行多层次干预。