Smith Richard S, Pineiro Silvia A, Singh Ruby, Romberg Elaine, Labib Mohamed E, Williams Henry N
Department of OCBS, University of Maryland Dental School, 666 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Curr Microbiol. 2004 Apr;48(4):243-6. doi: 10.1007/s00284-003-4130-5.
Monitoring the number of bacterial colony-forming units is an important step in assuring compliance with the recommendation that water from dental units contain <200 CFU mL(-1). Media that have been used for this purpose include R2A, a standard plate counting medium for water samples, and the Millipore HPC Sampler device, designed to facilitate sampling in dental offices. Discrepancies between the two media have been observed. This study tested the hypothesis that differences in counts on the two media were due to the failure of some bacteria to grow on the HPC sampler or to grow at less efficiency than on R2A. Of four different bacterial colony phenotypes tested in three independent experimental trials, one phenotype did not grow on the HPC device, and another grew inconsistently and at lower efficiency. These results confirmed the hypothesis. From these findings, users of the HPC sampler should be aware that microbial undercounts may occur.
监测细菌菌落形成单位的数量是确保符合牙科设备用水含菌量<200 CFU/mL(-1)这一建议的重要步骤。用于此目的的培养基包括R2A(一种用于水样的标准平板计数培养基)以及旨在便于在牙科诊所采样的密理博HPC采样器装置。已观察到这两种培养基之间存在差异。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即两种培养基上计数的差异是由于一些细菌无法在HPC采样器上生长,或者生长效率低于在R2A上的生长效率。在三项独立的实验试验中对四种不同的细菌菌落表型进行了测试,其中一种表型在HPC装置上不生长,另一种生长不稳定且效率较低。这些结果证实了该假设。基于这些发现,HPC采样器的使用者应意识到可能会出现微生物计数不足的情况。