Wang Jian, Wang Yang-tian, Shao Jia-qing, Wang Xiao, Du Hong
Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing 210002, China.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Feb;43(2):125-7.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of 4 immunosuppressants in treating Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO).
Seventy-five untreated GO patients were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis of GO was based on the presence of the typical clinical features and exclusion of possible cranial/orbital diseases. In group A, 31 patients were randomly assigned to receive either prednisone (n = 16, treatment completed in 13 cases with doses of 40 mg, 20 mg and 10 mg per day for 4 weeks) or tripterygium wilfordii multiglycoside (TW, n = 15, 30 - 60 mg per day); in group B, 23 adults were randomized to receive cyclosporin A (CsA, n = 11, 5 - 6 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n = 12, 16 - 18 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) therapy. The remaining 21 patients (control group) were given only anti-thyroid drugs and levo-thyroxine. The disease severity and therapeutic response were quantitatively assessed according to the Ophthalmopathy Index Scoring System from Given-Wilson (1989) with sensible modification. Improvement or progression of ophthalmopathy was defined if the difference, either increase or decrease, of the score, reached 3 or more in the ophthalmopathy index. If this did not occur, a lack of response was indicated.
After 12 weeks, 7 of the 13 treated with prednisone improved and the remaining 6 lacked response. In the TW group, 10 of the 15 responded to the therapy; 5 had no change. There was no significant difference in clinical response between the above 2 groups (P > 0.05). Five CsA-treated and 11 MMF-treated patients responded to the therapy (45% vs 92%; P < 0.05). It seems that MMF is more effective than CsA in the treatment of GO, although a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the mean score of the CsA group has also been shown at the end of the course. Four of the controls improved, 5 (24%) showed worsening of ophthalmopathy, and the remaining 12 (57%) had no significant change. In the prednisone group, 3 gained body weight by more than 5%, and 2 developed impaired glucose tolerance. These two and one of the three weight gaining patients ceased the therapy.
New immunosuppressant MMF may be more effective than CsA in the treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy. TW may be equally effective as and perhaps better tolerable than prednisone in the immunotherapy of Graves' ophthalmopathy.
比较4种免疫抑制剂治疗格雷夫斯眼病(GO)的疗效和耐受性。
75例未经治疗的GO患者纳入本研究。GO的诊断基于典型临床特征的存在及排除可能的颅脑/眼眶疾病。A组31例患者随机分配接受泼尼松(n = 16,13例完成治疗,剂量为每日40 mg、20 mg和10 mg,共4周)或雷公藤多苷(TW,n = 15,每日30 - 60 mg)治疗;B组23例成人随机接受环孢素A(CsA,n = 11,每日每千克体重5 - 6 mg)或霉酚酸酯(MMF,n = 12,每日每千克体重16 - 18 mg)治疗。其余21例患者(对照组)仅给予抗甲状腺药物和左甲状腺素。根据1989年Given-Wilson的眼病指数评分系统并进行合理修改,对疾病严重程度和治疗反应进行定量评估。如果眼病指数评分的差异(增加或减少)达到3分或更多,则定义为眼病改善或进展。如果未出现这种情况,则表明无反应。
12周后,13例接受泼尼松治疗的患者中7例改善,其余6例无反应。在TW组,15例中有10例对治疗有反应;5例无变化。上述两组之间的临床反应无显著差异(P > 0.05)。5例接受CsA治疗和11例接受MMF治疗的患者对治疗有反应(45%对92%;P < 0.05)。似乎MMF在治疗GO方面比CsA更有效,尽管在疗程结束时CsA组的平均评分也有显著下降(P < 0.01)。对照组中有4例改善,5例(24%)眼病恶化,其余12例(57%)无显著变化。在泼尼松组中,3例体重增加超过5%,2例出现糖耐量受损。这2例以及3例体重增加患者中的1例停止了治疗。
新型免疫抑制剂MMF在治疗格雷夫斯眼病方面可能比CsA更有效。在格雷夫斯眼病的免疫治疗中,TW可能与泼尼松同样有效,且耐受性可能更好。