• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎短程抗生素治疗的荟萃分析

Metaanalysis of short course antibiotic treatment for group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

作者信息

Casey Janet R, Pichichero Michael E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Elmwood Pediatric Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Oct;24(10):909-17. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000180573.21718.36.

DOI:10.1097/01.inf.0000180573.21718.36
PMID:16220091
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare bacterial and clinical cure rates in patients with group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis treated with oral beta-lactam or macrolide antibiotics for 4-5 days versus 10-day comparators.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, reference lists and abstract searches were used to identify available publications. Trials were included if there was bacteriologic confirmation of GAS tonsillopharyngitis, random assignment to antibiotic therapy for a beta-lactam or macrolide antibiotic of a shortened course versus a 10-day comparator and assessment of bacteriologic outcome using a throat culture.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials involving 7470 patients were included in 4 separate analyses. Trials were grouped by a short course of cephalosporins (n = 14), macrolides (other than azithromycin) (n = 6) and penicillin (n = 2). Cephalosporin trials were further grouped by the comparator, penicillin or the same cephalosporin. Short course cephalosporin treatment was superior for bacterial cure rate compared with 10 days of penicillin [odds ratio (OR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-2.03]. For trials with short course macrolide therapy, OR = 0.79 (95% CI 0.59-1.06) neither the macrolides nor the 10-day comparators. Short course penicillin therapy was inferior in achieving bacterial cure versus 10 days of penicillin, OR = 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.63). Clinical cure rates mirrored bacteriologic cure rates.

CONCLUSION

Superior cure rates can be achieved with shortened courses of cephalosporin therapy, but 5 days is inferior to 10 days of penicillin treatment.

摘要

目的

比较口服β-内酰胺类或大环内酯类抗生素治疗4 - 5天与10天对照治疗A组链球菌(GAS)扁桃体咽炎患者的细菌清除率和临床治愈率。

方法

通过检索Medline、Embase、参考文献列表和摘要来识别可用的出版物。纳入标准为:有GAS扁桃体咽炎的细菌学确诊;随机分配接受β-内酰胺类或大环内酯类抗生素短疗程治疗或10天对照治疗;使用咽拭子培养评估细菌学结果。

结果

22项涉及7470例患者的试验纳入4项独立分析。试验按短疗程头孢菌素(n = 14)、大环内酯类(阿奇霉素除外)(n = 6)和青霉素(n = 2)分组。头孢菌素试验再按对照药物分为青霉素或相同头孢菌素组。短疗程头孢菌素治疗的细菌清除率优于10天青霉素治疗[比值比(OR),1.47;95%置信区间(CI),1.06 - 2.03]。对于短疗程大环内酯类治疗的试验,OR = 0.79(95% CI 0.59 - 1.06),大环内酯类和10天对照治疗均未显示优势。短疗程青霉素治疗在实现细菌清除方面劣于10天青霉素治疗,OR = 0.29(95% CI 0.13 - 0.63)。临床治愈率与细菌学治愈率情况相似。

结论

短疗程头孢菌素治疗可获得更高治愈率,但5天疗程不如10天青霉素治疗。

相似文献

1
Metaanalysis of short course antibiotic treatment for group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎短程抗生素治疗的荟萃分析
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Oct;24(10):909-17. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000180573.21718.36.
2
Meta-analysis of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children.头孢菌素与青霉素治疗儿童A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):866-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.866.
3
Comparison of European and U.S. results for cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.欧洲和美国使用头孢菌素与青霉素治疗A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的结果比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):354-64. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0154-7.
4
Bacterial eradication rates with shortened courses of 2nd- and 3rd-generation cephalosporins versus 10 days of penicillin for treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in adults.第二代和第三代头孢菌素缩短疗程与10天青霉素治疗成人A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的细菌清除率比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Oct;59(2):127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.04.010.
5
Meta-analysis of cephalosporins versus penicillin for treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in adults.头孢菌素与青霉素治疗成人A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):1526-34. doi: 10.1086/392496. Epub 2004 May 11.
6
Effectiveness and safety of short-course vs long-course antibiotic therapy for group a beta hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.短期与长期抗生素治疗A组β溶血性链球菌扁桃体咽炎的有效性和安全性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Aug;83(8):880-9.
7
Higher dosages of azithromycin are more effective in treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.较高剂量的阿奇霉素治疗A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎更有效。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1748-55. doi: 10.1086/430307. Epub 2005 May 13.
8
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 17;3(3):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub5.
9
Group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: cost-effective diagnosis and treatment.A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎:具有成本效益的诊断与治疗
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;25(3):390-403. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70300-4.
10
Antibacterial therapy for acute group a streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis: short-course versus traditional 10-day oral regimens.急性 A 组链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的抗菌治疗:短疗程与传统 10 天口服方案对比
Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(11):747-54. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204110-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a Widespread Reduction in Treatment Duration for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis on Outcomes Including Household Transmission.A组链球菌性咽炎治疗时长普遍缩短对包括家庭传播在内的结局的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 6;12(7):ofaf323. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf323. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Tonsillectomy compared with conservative management in patients over 16 years with recurrent sore throat: the NATTINA RCT and economic evaluation.扁桃体切除术与保守治疗对 16 岁以上复发性咽痛患者的比较:NATTINA RCT 及经济学评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(31):1-195. doi: 10.3310/YKUR3660.
3
Time to negative throat culture following initiation of antibiotics for pharyngeal group A : a systematic review and meta-analysis up to October 2021 to inform public health control measures.
开始使用抗生素治疗咽峡炎 A 组群后进行咽拭子培养的时间:截至 2021 年 10 月的系统评价和荟萃分析,为公共卫生控制措施提供信息。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Apr;28(15). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.15.2200573.
4
Effectiveness of antibacterial agents against cell-invading bacteria such as Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae.抗菌药物对侵袭性细菌如化脓性链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌的疗效。
BMC Microbiol. 2021 May 14;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02217-y.
5
Short- vs. Long-Course Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.急性链球菌性咽炎短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;9(11):733. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110733.
6
Amoxicillin effect on bacterial load in group A streptococcal pharyngitis: comparison of single and multiple daily dosage regimens.阿莫西林对 A 组链球菌性咽炎细菌负荷的影响:单剂量与多剂量方案的比较。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1582-8.
7
Treatment Challenges of Group A Beta-hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngo-Tonsillitis.A组β溶血性链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的治疗挑战
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;21(3):286-296. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584294. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
8
Evaluation of Rational Drug Use for Acute Pharyngitis Associated with the Incidence and Prevalence of the Disease at Two Community Health Centers in Indonesia.印度尼西亚两家社区卫生中心急性咽炎合理用药评估及其发病率和患病率研究
Sci Pharm. 2017 Apr 28;85(2):22. doi: 10.3390/scipharm85020022.
9
Penicillin failure in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngo-tonsillitis.青霉素治疗链球菌性咽扁桃体炎失败。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013 Jun;15(3):232-5. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0338-0.
10
Comparative Study of 5-Day and 10-Day Cefditoren Pivoxil Treatments for Recurrent Group A beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus pharyngitis in Children.5日和10日头孢妥仑匹酯治疗儿童复发性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的对比研究
Int J Pediatr. 2009;2009:863608. doi: 10.1155/2009/863608. Epub 2009 Mar 5.