Suppr超能文献

目前用于评估调度分诊系统的标准:它们将我们置于何处?

Criteria currently used to evaluate dispatch triage systems: where do they leave us?

作者信息

Schmidt Terri A, Cone David C, Mann N Clay

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004 Apr-Jun;8(2):126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.003.

Abstract

Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems are interested in considering the possibility of triaging some patients who call an emergency dispatch center to alternatives to the traditional emergency response, but concerns exist about the safety of that triage. In January 2003, the Neely Conference was held in association with the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting in Panama City, Florida. The Neely Conference began the process of developing criteria to be used in research studies evaluating dispatch and field triage systems. Various outcome measures have been used, including expert opinion, patient interviews, specific patient complaints, field findings and interventions, and emergency department or hospital outcomes. This commentary reviews the methods used in the current literature to evaluate dispatch triage systems.

摘要

一些紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统有兴趣考虑对拨打紧急调度中心电话的部分患者进行分流,使其不采用传统的紧急响应方式,但人们对这种分流的安全性存在担忧。2003年1月,与美国紧急医疗服务医师协会在佛罗里达州巴拿马城召开的年会相关联,举行了尼利会议。尼利会议开启了制定用于评估调度和现场分流系统的研究标准的进程。已经采用了各种结果指标,包括专家意见、患者访谈、特定患者投诉、现场发现及干预措施,以及急诊科或医院的结果。本评论回顾了当前文献中用于评估调度分流系统的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验