Suppr超能文献

对于临床分期为III期的食管腺癌患者,术前放化疗并不能提高食管切除术后的早期生存率。

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy does not improve early survival after esophagectomy for patients with clinical stage III adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

作者信息

Donington Jessica S, Miller Daniel L, Allen Mark S, Deschamps Claude, Nichols Francis C, Pairolero Peter C

机构信息

Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1193-8; discussion 1198-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative chemoradiation therapy (P-CRT) followed by esophagectomy for patients with clinical stage III adenocarcinoma of the esophagus offered any survival advantage as compared with esophagectomy alone.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and June 2001, 75 nonrandomized patients with clinical stage III adenocarcinoma of the esophagus underwent either P-CRT and esophagectomy or esophagectomy alone. All patients were staged before initiation of treatment with computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound.

RESULTS

P-CRT followed by esophagectomy was performed in 47 patients (63%) and esophagectomy alone in 28 patients (37%). Although the P-CRT group was younger (median age, 61 years versus 67 years), the two groups were otherwise similar for gender, comorbidities, and symptoms. Overall operative mortality was 4%. Follow-up was complete in all patients and ranged from 5 to 40 months (median, 20 months). Overall, one-, two-, and three-year survivals were 72%, 44%, and 42%, respectively. Three-year survival was identical (42%) for both the P-CRT and surgery alone patients (p = 0.70). Three-year disease-free survival for the P-CRT group was 29% as compared with 33% for the surgery only group (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinical stage III adenocarcinoma of the esophagus do not appear to gain an early overall or disease-free survival advantage when treated with P-CRT followed by surgery as compared with surgery alone. However, long-term follow-up is needed. A large, prospective, randomized trial is warranted to address the question of whether P-CRT offers any survival benefit or impact on pattern of recurrence in patients undergoing esophagectomy for locally advanced disease.

摘要

背景

局部晚期食管癌的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定与单纯食管切除术相比,术前放化疗(P-CRT)联合食管切除术对临床III期食管腺癌患者是否具有生存优势。

方法

1998年1月至2001年6月期间,75例非随机分组的临床III期食管腺癌患者接受了P-CRT联合食管切除术或单纯食管切除术。所有患者在治疗开始前均通过计算机断层扫描和内镜超声进行分期。

结果

47例患者(63%)接受了P-CRT联合食管切除术,28例患者(37%)接受了单纯食管切除术。虽然P-CRT组患者较年轻(中位年龄61岁对67岁),但两组在性别、合并症和症状方面相似。总体手术死亡率为4%。所有患者均完成随访,随访时间为5至40个月(中位时间20个月)。总体而言,1年、2年和3年生存率分别为72%、44%和42%。P-CRT组和单纯手术组的3年生存率相同(42%)(p = 0.70)。P-CRT组的3年无病生存率为29%,而单纯手术组为33%(p = 0.51)。

结论

与单纯手术相比,临床III期食管腺癌患者接受P-CRT联合手术后,在早期总体生存或无病生存方面似乎没有优势。然而,需要进行长期随访。有必要开展一项大型前瞻性随机试验,以解决P-CRT对接受食管切除术治疗局部晚期疾病的患者是否具有生存益处或对复发模式有影响的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验