Adler Lenard, Cohen Julie
Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, FPO Offices, 530 First Avenue, Suite 5A, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004 Jun;27(2):187-201. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2003.12.003.
Although some areas of adult ADHD knowledge remain unclear, there isa strong sense of how to proceed with diagnosis using current DSM-IV criteria as a guide. Thorough clinical interview, aided by the use of rating scales for current symptoms and collateral information about childhood from parents or siblings, forms the backbone of the assessment. The poor psychosocial outcomes of patients with ADHD. often a consequence of unrecognized,untreated disorder manifestation, also can serve as a diagnostic indicator. Diagnostic and symptom assessment scales also can be a significant helpin diagnosing and establishing the symptoms of ADHD in adults. It is important to remember that according to DSM-IV, the cardinal criteria for making the diagnosis are the presence of sufficient current symptoms and impairment in two realms (home, school/work, and social interactions). Accordingly, adult ADHD remains a clinical diagnosis, and the clinician-administered interview remains the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation.
尽管成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)知识的某些领域仍不明确,但对于如何以当前的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)标准为指导进行诊断,人们已有强烈的认知。全面的临床访谈,辅以针对当前症状的评定量表以及来自父母或兄弟姐妹的关于童年的旁证信息,构成了评估的核心。ADHD患者不良的心理社会后果,通常是未被识别、未得到治疗的病症表现的结果,这也可作为一项诊断指标。诊断和症状评定量表在诊断及确定成人ADHD症状方面也能提供很大帮助。重要的是要记住,根据DSM-IV,做出诊断的主要标准是在两个领域(家庭、学校/工作和社交互动)存在足够的当前症状及功能损害。因此,成人ADHD仍然是一种临床诊断,临床医生进行的访谈仍是诊断评估的基石。