Gostautas Antanas, Perminas Aidas
Institute of Cardiology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Sukileliu 17, 3000 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40(3):265-71.
The aim of the present study was to determine the significance of risk areas of stressogenic behavior (type A) and smoking for development of myocardial infarction and death within various time periods from the first health screening; as well as to evaluate the impact of the cumulative effect of these two factors upon the development of myocardial infarction and death. Behavioral activity (type A behavior) was assessed using short D. Jenkins questionnaire, and four factors (competitiveness, impatience, job stress, and responsibility), which were obtained via factor analysis of the 61-item D. Jenkins questionnaire. Risk areas of these variables were calculated by purposeful segmentation method. Smoking pattern was attributed to either dissonant or consonant by answers to a specially constructed question. The subjects were 1806 middle-aged men, participants of Kaunas-Rotterdam Intervention Study, who had undergone behavioral assessment, and were free from myocardial infarction at entry. Myocardial infarction and deaths were registered since the beginning of the study in 1972-1974 until January 1, 1997 (within that period myocardial infarction was diagnosed to 243 men, and 638 men died from various causes). The results showed that consonant smoking precipitates the onset of myocardial infarction, while the same effect of dissonant smoking reveals itself after a longer time period. Likelihood to die from various causes within 25 years did not depend upon a particular pattern of smoking, and was the greatest among the heaviest smokers. Consonant smoking, as detected during the first health screening, increases mortality rate within subsequent 16 years, while this effect among dissonant smokers manifests itself after the 16-year period. The relationship of overall type A behavior disposition with myocardial infarction was found within the first 16 years from the first screening, while that of competitiveness and myocardial infarction could be detected earlier (within the first 8 years). Cumulative effect of type A behavior and smoking patterns upon myocardial infarction and deaths was ambiguous; i. e. competitiveness was not related to smoking, while myocardial infarction precipitating impact of type A behavior was more prominent among smokers. Smoking was more related to mortality rates; therefore mortality-related effect of responsibility factor was greater among non-smokers.
本研究的目的是确定应激行为(A型)和吸烟的风险区域对首次健康筛查后不同时间段内心肌梗死发生和死亡的意义;并评估这两个因素的累积效应对心肌梗死发生和死亡的影响。使用简短的D.詹金斯问卷评估行为活动(A型行为),并通过对61项D.詹金斯问卷进行因子分析得出四个因素(竞争力、不耐烦、工作压力和责任感)。这些变量的风险区域通过有目的的分段方法计算得出。根据对一个专门构建问题的回答,将吸烟模式归为不和谐或和谐。研究对象为1806名中年男性,他们是考纳斯 - 鹿特丹干预研究的参与者,接受过行为评估,且在入组时无心肌梗死。自1972 - 1974年研究开始至1997年1月1日记录心肌梗死和死亡情况(在此期间,243名男性被诊断为心肌梗死,638名男性死于各种原因)。结果表明,和谐吸烟会促使心肌梗死的发作,而不和谐吸烟的相同作用在较长时间后才显现出来。25年内死于各种原因的可能性并不取决于特定的吸烟模式,且在吸烟最严重的人群中最高。首次健康筛查时检测到的和谐吸烟会增加随后16年内的死亡率,而不和谐吸烟者中的这种影响在16年后才显现。从首次筛查起的前16年内发现总体A型行为倾向与心肌梗死有关,而竞争力与心肌梗死的关系可更早检测到(在前8年内)。A型行为和吸烟模式对心肌梗死和死亡的累积效应不明确;即竞争力与吸烟无关,而A型行为对心肌梗死的促发影响在吸烟者中更为突出。吸烟与死亡率的关系更大;因此,责任因素对死亡率的影响在非吸烟者中更大。