Hoyer William J, Stawski Robert S, Wasylyshyn Christina, Verhaeghen Paul
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-2340, USA.
Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar;19(1):211-4. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.211.
This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of the effects of age, education, and estimated year of measurement on scores from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Analysis of effect sizes for age reported in 141 studies published between 1986 and 2002 indicated a mean standardized difference of -2.07. Age accounted for 86% of the variance in a regression model using age, education, and year submitted as predictors of Digit Symbol scores. There was no association between years of education or year submitted and Digit Symbol scores for younger adults or older adults.
本文报告了一项荟萃分析的结果,该分析涉及年龄、教育程度和估计测量年份对韦氏成人智力量表及韦氏成人智力量表修订版数字符号替换测验分数的影响。对1986年至2002年间发表的141项研究中报告的年龄效应量进行分析,结果显示平均标准化差异为-2.07。在以年龄、教育程度和年份作为数字符号分数预测变量的回归模型中,年龄解释了86%的方差。对于年轻人或老年人,教育年限或测量年份与数字符号分数之间均无关联。