Freed Gary L, Dunham Kelly M, Switalski Kara E, Jones M Douglas, McGuinness Gail A
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0456, USA.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123 Suppl 1:S31-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1578I.
Training for pediatric residents who intend to pursue fellowship differs little from training for residents who intend to practice general pediatrics. It is unknown how well residents who intend to pursue subspecialty training believe that residency prepares them for subspecialty fellowships or future careers. To characterize the strengths and weaknesses of residency training and the factors influencing subspecialty choice from the perspective of subspecialty fellows, we conducted a survey of current fellows on these issues.
A random sample of 1000 physicians who were entering their second or third year of fellowship in the United States in 2007 received a structured questionnaire by mail. The survey focused on decision-making in selection of residency and fellowship programs, strength of residency training in preparation for fellowship, and plans for future practice.
The overall response rate was 81%. A majority of the fellows would not have shortened their general pediatrics residency before fellowship if given the option (64% [n = 482]). However, more than half (52% [n = 390]) of the fellows would have chosen a 2-year fellowship without research or scholarly activity over the current 3-year structure. Few current fellows believed they could have used any additional training in the areas of patient safety, coordination of care for children with complex illnesses, or patient communication.
The finding that a large proportion of fellows would opt for shortened subspecialty training should prompt discussion and debate within the profession regarding the skills necessary for a pediatric subspecialist. Patient safety, physician-parent communication, and care coordination are emphasized primarily through informal training during residency. Although most clinicians believe themselves to be adequately prepared, research has identified gaps in clinician skills and understanding of these issues of great importance to patients and their families.
打算攻读专科 fellowship 的儿科住院医师培训与打算从事普通儿科学的住院医师培训差别不大。打算接受亚专科培训的住院医师认为住院医师培训对他们准备亚专科 fellowship 或未来职业的程度如何尚不清楚。为了从亚专科 fellowship 学员的角度描述住院医师培训的优势和劣势以及影响亚专科选择的因素,我们针对这些问题对当前的学员进行了一项调查。
2007 年在美国进入第二年或第三年 fellowship 的 1000 名医生的随机样本通过邮件收到了一份结构化问卷。该调查集中于住院医师和 fellowship 项目选择中的决策、为 fellowship 做准备的住院医师培训的优势以及未来执业计划。
总体回复率为 81%。如果有选择的话,大多数学员不会在攻读 fellowship 之前缩短他们的普通儿科住院医师培训时间(64%[n = 482])。然而,超过一半(52%[n = 390])的学员会选择一个没有研究或学术活动的 2 年制 fellowship,而不是当前的 3 年制结构。很少有当前的学员认为他们在患者安全、复杂疾病儿童的护理协调或医患沟通方面可以利用任何额外的培训。
很大一部分学员会选择缩短亚专科培训这一发现应促使该行业内就儿科亚专科医生所需技能展开讨论和辩论。患者安全、医患沟通和护理协调主要通过住院医师培训期间的非正式培训来强调。尽管大多数临床医生认为自己准备充分,但研究已经发现临床医生在这些对患者及其家庭非常重要的问题上的技能和理解存在差距。