Marshall C, Wesselingh S, McDonald M, Spelman D
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56(4):253-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.02.001.
Although there is extensive literature on the control of MRSA, when that concerning epidemics is excluded, only a limited amount remains regarding the control of endemic MRSA. Several guidelines have been recently published recommending stringent control measures, which are often suggested based on their success in controlling MRSA outbreaks in hospitals with few MRSA or in containing MRSA cases introduced into a hospital with no MRSA. In these settings, multiple measures are usually introduced with apparently successful results. However, results may not be generalizable to other settings and we do not know the minimum effective measures required for MRSA containment. This paper aims critically to review the literature to determine whether evidence exists for the value of the infection control measures that are widely recommended in the endemic setting. Much of this literature is based on observational studies, with few randomized, controlled trials having been conducted. More well-designed studies are required before many of the principles on which we build infection control programmes can be regarded as evidence based.
尽管关于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)控制的文献颇为丰富,但排除有关疫情的文献后,关于地方性MRSA控制的文献数量有限。最近已发布了若干指南,推荐采取严格的控制措施,这些措施往往是基于其在MRSA感染率低的医院控制MRSA疫情或在无MRSA的医院控制引入的MRSA病例方面的成功经验而提出的。在这些情况下,通常会采取多种措施,且效果明显。然而,这些结果可能无法推广至其他情况,而且我们并不清楚控制MRSA所需的最低有效措施。本文旨在批判性地回顾相关文献,以确定在地方性环境中广泛推荐的感染控制措施的价值是否有证据支持。这些文献大多基于观察性研究,很少有随机对照试验。在我们建立感染控制项目所依据的许多原则被视为基于证据之前,还需要进行更多设计完善的研究。