• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰医院入院时耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的低患病率:筛查与清除以及限制抗生素使用的价值

Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use.

作者信息

Wertheim H F L, Vos M C, Boelens H A M, Voss A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C M J E, Meester M H M, Kluytmans J A J W, van Keulen P H J, Verbrugh H A

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.01.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2004.01.026
PMID:15066745
Abstract

In the Netherlands, less than 1% of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus are methicillin-resistant (MRSA). A national search and destroy policy prevents MRSA from becoming endemic. Some MRSA outbreaks cannot be related to patients at risk for MRSA carriage. This study was designed to measure the prevalence of MRSA among patients without risk factors for MRSA carriage at the time of admission to the hospital. In four Dutch hospitals, patients admitted to non-surgical departments in the period 1999-2000 were screened for MRSA nasal carriage. Nasal swabs were streaked on 5% sheep blood agar (BA), submerged in a selective broth, and incubated for two to three days at 35 degrees C. Colonies suspected of being S. aureus were identified with an agglutination test. Susceptibility testing was performed by an automated system and additional oxacillin disk diffusion. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by a DNA hybridization test and mecA PCR. MRSA strains were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Twenty-four percent (2332/9859) of the patients were S. aureus nasal carriers. Only three (0.03%) patients were MRSA carriers. These patients were not repatriated, nor known to be MRSA carriers before screening. Genotyping revealed that the strains were not clonally related and were not related to MRSA outbreaks in the hospital where the patients were admitted. We conclude that at routine admission to a Dutch hospital (excluding high-risk foreign admissions) the MRSA prevalence is low (0.03%), due to the Dutch search and destroy policy and restrictive antibiotic prescribing.

摘要

在荷兰,金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株中耐甲氧西林的比例不到1%。一项全国性的“搜索并消灭”政策防止了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)成为地方病。一些MRSA暴发与有MRSA携带风险的患者无关。本研究旨在测量入院时无MRSA携带风险因素的患者中MRSA的流行率。在荷兰的四家医院,对1999年至2000年期间入住非外科科室的患者进行了MRSA鼻腔携带情况筛查。将鼻拭子接种在5%绵羊血琼脂(BA)上,浸入选择性肉汤中,并在35℃下培养两到三天。通过凝集试验鉴定疑似金黄色葡萄球菌的菌落。药敏试验通过自动化系统和额外的苯唑西林纸片扩散法进行。通过DNA杂交试验和mecA PCR确认耐甲氧西林情况。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)对MRSA菌株进行基因分型。24%(2332/9859)的患者为金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带者。只有三名(0.03%)患者为MRSA携带者。这些患者未被遣返,在筛查前也不知道是MRSA携带者。基因分型显示,这些菌株在克隆上不相关,也与患者所入住医院的MRSA暴发无关。我们得出结论,由于荷兰的“搜索并消灭”政策和严格的抗生素处方,在荷兰医院常规入院时(不包括高风险的外国患者入院),MRSA流行率较低(0.03%)。

相似文献

1
Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use.荷兰医院入院时耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的低患病率:筛查与清除以及限制抗生素使用的价值
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.01.026.
2
A predictive model for identifying surgical patients at risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage on admission.一种用于识别入院时存在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带风险的外科手术患者的预测模型。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
3
Prevalence of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in healthcare workers at Namazi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran.伊朗设拉子纳马齐医院医护人员耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带率及其抗生素敏感性模式
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;13(5):e241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.11.026. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
4
Sustained low prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus upon admission to hospital in The Netherlands.荷兰住院患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的持续低流行率。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Nov;79(3):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
5
Nasal carriage of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the prevalence, patients at risk and the effect of elimination on outcomes among outclinic haemodialysis patients.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔携带情况:门诊血液透析患者中的患病率、高危患者以及清除该菌对预后的影响
Eur J Med Res. 2007 Jul 26;12(7):284-8.
6
[Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of livestock origin in Dutch hospitals: high-risk patients need only to be investigated if admitted to hospital].荷兰医院中源自牲畜的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌:仅需对高危患者入院时进行调查
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 6;152(49):2681-8.
7
Cost of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus search and destroy policy in a Dutch university hospital.荷兰一家大学医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌筛查与清除策略的成本
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Apr;68(4):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
8
Determining risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage after discharge from hospital.确定出院后耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带的危险因素。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Jul;42(3):213-8. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0585.
9
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among healthy adults.健康成年人鼻腔中金黄色葡萄球菌的携带情况。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006 Dec;39(6):458-64.
10
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage at the time of admission in two acute geriatric wards.两个老年急性病房入院时耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带情况
J Hosp Infect. 2002 Feb;50(2):122-6. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1152.

引用本文的文献

1
MRSA Profiles Reveal Age- and Gender-Specificity in a Tertiary Care Hospital: High Burden in ICU Elderly and Emerging Community Patterns in Youth.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)谱揭示了三级医院中的年龄和性别特异性:重症监护病房老年患者负担重,青年人群中出现社区感染新趋势。
Microorganisms. 2025 May 6;13(5):1078. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051078.
2
Should all hospitalised patients colonised with be considered for isolation?所有被[病原体名称]定植的住院患者都应被考虑隔离吗? (你提供的原文中“colonised with”后面缺少具体病原体名称)
Euro Surveill. 2024 Nov;29(45). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.45.2400729.
3
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在糖尿病和非糖尿病足部感染中的作用。
Int Wound J. 2024 Sep;21(9):e70039. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70039.
4
Molecular characterization of MRSA collected during national surveillance between 2008 and 2019 in the Netherlands.2008年至2019年荷兰全国监测期间收集的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的分子特征。
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Sep 12;3(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00348-z.
5
Success rates of MRSA decolonization and factors associated with failure.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)去定植成功率及失败相关因素。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 22;11(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01177-w.
6
Exploring the Barriers in the Uptake of the Dutch MRSA 'Search and Destroy' Policy Using the Cascade of Care Approach.使用护理级联方法探索荷兰耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌“搜索并消灭”政策实施过程中的障碍。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;11(9):1216. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091216.
7
Isolation strategy for controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: Is this still an essential option in hospitals?控制多重耐药菌传播的隔离策略:这在医院中仍是一项必不可少的选择吗?
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2021 Nov;39(9):425-428. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2021.04.007.
8
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) prevalence in humans in close contact with animals and measures to reduce on-farm colonisation.与家畜相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(LA-MRSA)在与动物密切接触人群中的流行情况以及减少农场定植的措施。
Ir Vet J. 2021 Aug 6;74(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13620-021-00200-7.
9
Complicated Carriage with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Decolonization Regimens Advised in the Dutch National Guideline.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植的复杂性 carriage:评估荷兰国家指南建议的去定植方案的有效性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e0025721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00257-21.
10
Isolation strategy for controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: Is this still an essential option in hospitals?控制多重耐药菌传播的隔离策略:这在医院中仍然是一项必要选择吗?
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun 18;39(9):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.04.010.