• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰一家大学医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌筛查与清除策略的成本

Cost of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus search and destroy policy in a Dutch university hospital.

作者信息

Nulens E, Broex E, Ament A, Deurenberg R H, Smeets E, Scheres J, van Tiel F H, Gordts B, Stobberingh E E

机构信息

Medical Microbiology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2008 Apr;68(4):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.018
PMID:18353496
Abstract

Costs related to a search and destroy policy and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in the University Hospital Maastricht were calculated for the period 2000 and 2004. The financial cost-benefit break-even point of the search and destroy policy was determined by modelling. On average 22,412 patients were admitted per year for an average of 8.7 days. Each year 246 patients were screened for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 74 patients were decolonised and nursed in preventive isolation. The prevalence of MRSA in the University Hospital Maastricht was 0.7%, as calculated from positive blood cultures, and mean length of stay for all patients with S. aureus bloodstream infections was 39.9 days. The annual cost of pro-active searching for MRSA in the University Hospital Maastricht was euro 1,383,200, and euro 2,736,762 for MRSA prevention and treatment of S. aureus bloodstream infections. Simulation of a variety MRSA/meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) ratios showed that even if the MRSA prevalence reaches 8%, prevention costs are still lower than the cost of treating S. aureus infections. In conclusion, the total cost of a search and destroy policy is lower than the cost of treating S. aureus bloodstream infections in the University Hospital Maastricht. At an MRSA prevalence of <or=8% the search and destroy policy remains cost-effective. From an economic point of view, the search and destroy policy is the best alternative at maintaining an endemic MRSA level at <1%.

摘要

计算了2000年至2004年期间马斯特里赫特大学医院与金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的筛查清除策略及治疗相关的成本。通过建模确定了筛查清除策略的财务成本效益平衡点。平均每年有22412名患者入院,平均住院8.7天。每年对246名患者进行耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查,74名患者进行去定植并接受预防性隔离护理。根据血培养阳性结果计算,马斯特里赫特大学医院MRSA的患病率为0.7%,所有金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染患者的平均住院时间为39.9天。马斯特里赫特大学医院主动筛查MRSA的年度成本为1383200欧元,预防和治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的MRSA年度成本为2736762欧元。对多种MRSA/甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)比例的模拟显示,即使MRSA患病率达到8%,预防成本仍低于治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染的成本。总之,在马斯特里赫特大学医院,筛查清除策略的总成本低于治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的成本。当MRSA患病率≤8%时,筛查清除策略仍具有成本效益。从经济角度来看,在将MRSA地方流行水平维持在<1%时,筛查清除策略是最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Cost of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus search and destroy policy in a Dutch university hospital.荷兰一家大学医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌筛查与清除策略的成本
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Apr;68(4):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.018. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
2
Costs associated with a strict policy to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Dutch University Medical Center: a 10-year survey.荷兰一家大学医学中心实施根除耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌严格政策的相关成本:一项为期10年的调查。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;21(11):782-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0811-4. Epub 2002 Nov 8.
3
[The Dutch MRSA policy should be retained].应保留荷兰的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)政策。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Aug 26;150(34):1884.
4
Search and destroy policy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: cost-benefit analysis.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的搜索与清除策略:成本效益分析
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Sep;65(9):1853-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05050.x.
5
Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.甲氧西林敏感和耐药金黄色葡萄球菌感染的临床与经济学分析
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1377-82. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E028. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
6
Cost of bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant vs. methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌与甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌所致菌血症的成本比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jun;16(6):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02902.x. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
7
Costs and benefits of the MRSA Search and Destroy policy in a Dutch hospital.荷兰一家医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查与清除政策的成本与效益
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;28(10):1245-52. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0775-8. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
8
Costs of an outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌暴发的成本
J Hosp Infect. 2007 May;66(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
9
Costs of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its control.医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的成本及其控制。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Nov;28(5):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
10
Cost analysis of a hospital-wide selective screening programme for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers in the context of diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment.在诊断相关分组(DRG)付费背景下,对医院范围内耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)携带者进行选择性筛查计划的成本分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jun;11(6):466-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01153.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus across and within fitness facility types.分析不同健身设施类型及内部的金黄色葡萄球菌分子流行病学特征。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3699-7.
2
Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands.荷兰肯内梅林地区一家医院与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌“搜索并消灭”政策相关的成本与效益
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148175. eCollection 2016.
3
Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
抗生素耐药性的经济特征:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的案例
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Apr;33(4):285-325. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0242-y.
4
One-day point prevalence of emerging bacterial pathogens in a nationwide sample of 62 German hospitals in 2012 and comparison with the results of the one-day point prevalence of 2010.2012年德国62家医院全国性样本中新兴细菌病原体的一日点患病率及与2010年一日点患病率结果的比较。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013 Apr 29;8(1):Doc12. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000212. eCollection 2013.
5
Costs of healthcare- and community-associated infections with antimicrobial-resistant versus antimicrobial-susceptible organisms.抗微生物药物耐药与敏感菌所致的医疗保健和社区相关性感染的成本。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):807-15. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis552. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
6
Costs and benefits of the MRSA Search and Destroy policy in a Dutch hospital.荷兰一家医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)筛查与清除政策的成本与效益
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Oct;28(10):1245-52. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0775-8. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
7
[Nosocomial infections: MRSA und CDAD as a challenge].[医院感染:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌感染是一项挑战]
Internist (Berl). 2009 Jun;50(6):691-703; quiz 704-5. doi: 10.1007/s00108-009-2389-8.
8
Optical fingerprinting in bacterial epidemiology: Raman spectroscopy as a real-time typing method.细菌流行病学中的光学指纹识别:拉曼光谱作为一种实时分型方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):652-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01900-08. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
9
Surveillance of microbial resistance in European Intensive Care Units: a first report from the Care-ICU programme for improved infection control.欧洲重症监护病房微生物耐药性监测:来自Care-ICU项目以改善感染控制的首份报告
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan;35(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1237-y. Epub 2008 Aug 1.