Callaerts-Vegh Zsuzsanna, Evans Kenda L J, Dudekula Noornabi, Cuba Donald, Knoll Brian J, Callaerts Patrick F K, Giles Heather, Shardonofsky Felix R, Bond Richard A
Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston, 521 Science and Research Building 2, Houston, TX 77204-5037, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):4948-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400452101.
The clinical effects of treatment with beta-adrenoceptor (beta-AR) agonists and antagonists in heart failure vary with duration of therapy, as do the effects of beta-AR agonists in asthma. Therefore, we hypothesized that chronic effects of "beta-blockers" in asthma may differ from those observed acutely. We tested this hypothesis in an antigen (ovalbumin)-driven murine model of asthma. Airway resistance responses (Raw) to the muscarinic agonist methacholine were measured by using the forced oscillation technique. In comparison with nontreated asthmatic mice, we observed that: (i) The beta-AR antagonists nadolol or carvedilol, given as a single i.v. injection (acute treatment) 15 min before methacholine, increased methacholine-elicited peak Raw values by 33.7% and 67.7% (P < 0.05), respectively; when either drug was administered for 28 days (chronic treatment), the peak Raw values were decreased by 43% (P < 0.05) and 22.9% (P < 0.05), respectively. (ii) Chronic treatment with nadolol or carvedilol significantly increased beta-AR densities in lung membranes by 719% and 828%, respectively. (iii) Alprenolol, a beta-blocker with partial agonist properties at beta-ARs, behaved as a beta-AR agonist, and acutely reduced peak Raw value by 75.7% (P < 0.05); chronically, it did not alter Raw. (iv) Salbutamol, a beta-AR partial agonist, acutely decreased peak Raw by 41.1%; chronically, it did not alter Raw. (v) None of the beta-blockers produced significant changes in eosinophil number recovered in bronchoalveolar lavage. These results suggest that beta-AR agonists and beta-blockers with inverse agonist properties may exert reciprocating effects on cellular signaling dependent on duration of administration.
β-肾上腺素能受体(β-AR)激动剂和拮抗剂治疗心力衰竭的临床效果会随治疗持续时间而变化,β-AR激动剂治疗哮喘的效果也是如此。因此,我们推测“β受体阻滞剂”在哮喘中的慢性作用可能与急性观察到的作用不同。我们在抗原(卵清蛋白)驱动的小鼠哮喘模型中验证了这一假设。通过强迫振荡技术测量气道对毒蕈碱激动剂乙酰甲胆碱的阻力反应(Raw)。与未治疗的哮喘小鼠相比,我们观察到:(i)在乙酰甲胆碱给药前15分钟静脉单次注射(急性治疗)β-AR拮抗剂纳多洛尔或卡维地洛,可使乙酰甲胆碱诱发的Raw峰值分别增加33.7%和67.7%(P<0.05);当两种药物中的任何一种给药28天(慢性治疗)时,Raw峰值分别降低43%(P<0.05)和22.9%(P<0.05)。(ii)纳多洛尔或卡维地洛慢性治疗可使肺膜中的β-AR密度分别显著增加719%和828%。(iii)阿普洛尔是一种在β-ARs具有部分激动剂特性的β受体阻滞剂,表现为β-AR激动剂,急性时可使Raw峰值降低75.7%(P<0.05);长期而言,它不会改变Raw。(iv)β-AR部分激动剂沙丁胺醇急性时可使Raw峰值降低41.1%;长期而言,它不会改变Raw。(v)这些β受体阻滞剂均未使支气管肺泡灌洗回收的嗜酸性粒细胞数量产生显著变化。这些结果表明,β-AR激动剂和具有反向激动剂特性的β受体阻滞剂可能根据给药持续时间对细胞信号传导产生相互作用。