Suppr超能文献

噪声对健康的影响:过去25年文献中的证据。

Health effects caused by noise: evidence in the literature from the past 25 years.

作者信息

Ising H, Kruppa B

机构信息

Rheinstr. 69, D-14612 Falkensee, Germany.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2004 Jan-Mar;6(22):5-13.

Abstract

Traffic noise is the most important source of environmental annoyance. According to the Environmental Expert Council of Germany, severe annoyance persistent over prolonged periods of time is to be regarded as causing distress. Previously, extraaural noise effects were mostly assessed using a paradigm in which the sound level played the major role. On the basis of this paradigm the relatively low sound level of environmental noise was not considered to be a potential danger to health. In contrast to this numerous empirical results have shown long-term noise-induced health risks. Therefore a radical change of attitude - a change of paradigm - is necessary. For an immediate triggering of protective reactions (fight/flight or defeat reactions) the information conveyed by noise is very often more relevant than the sound level. It was shown recently that the first and fastest signal detection is mediated by a subcortical area - the amygdala. For this reason even during sleep the noise from aeroplanes or heavy goods vehicles may be categorised as danger signals and induce the release of stress hormones. In accordance with the noise stress hypothesis chronic stress hormone dysregulations as well as increases of established endogenous risk factors of ischaemic heart diseases have been observed under long-term environmental noise exposure. Therefore, an increased risk of myocardial infarction is to be expected. The results of individual studies on this subject in most cases do not reach statistical significance. However, according to the Environmental Expert Council, these studies show a consistent trend towards an increased cardiovascular risk if the daytime immission level exceeds 65 dB(A). Most of the previous studies on the extraaural effects of occupational noise have been invalidated by exposure misclassifications. In future studies on health effects of noise a correct exposure assessment is one of the most important preconditions.

摘要

交通噪音是环境烦恼的最重要来源。根据德国环境专家委员会的说法,长时间持续的严重烦恼应被视为造成痛苦。以前,耳外噪音影响大多使用以声级起主要作用的范式来评估。基于这种范式,环境噪音相对较低的声级不被认为是对健康的潜在危险。与此相反,大量实证结果表明存在长期噪音引发的健康风险。因此,态度的彻底转变——范式的转变——是必要的。对于立即触发保护反应(战斗/逃跑或失败反应),噪音传达的信息往往比声级更相关。最近表明,最早和最快的信号检测是由一个皮层下区域——杏仁核介导的。因此,即使在睡眠期间,飞机或重型货车的噪音也可能被归类为危险信号并诱导应激激素的释放。根据噪音应激假说,在长期环境噪音暴露下,已观察到慢性应激激素失调以及缺血性心脏病既定内源性风险因素的增加。因此,可以预期心肌梗死风险会增加。关于这个主题的个别研究结果在大多数情况下没有达到统计学意义。然而,根据环境专家委员会的说法,如果白天的排放水平超过65分贝(A),这些研究显示出心血管风险增加的一致趋势。以前关于职业噪音耳外影响的大多数研究因暴露错误分类而无效。在未来关于噪音对健康影响的研究中,正确的暴露评估是最重要的前提条件之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验