Ising H, Michalak R
Umweltbundesant a.D., Germany.
Noise Health. 2004 Jul-Sep;6(24):1-7.
Reactions to noise-induced communication disturbance of 42 men during a seminar were investigated. Stress reactions with or without road traffic noise (Lm = 60 dBA) were compared. Traffic noise was played back via loudspeakers during one day in the seminar room. The following parameters were measured: Fatigue and mental tension by questionnaire; blood pressure and heart rate; excretion of adrenaline, noradrenaline and cAMP from the collected urine. The same subjects participated in a laboratory test where the blood pressure was measured during 5 minutes of rest and after 5 minutes of exposure to intermittent white noise (Lm=97 dBA). It was found that the noise in the field experiment caused psychological and physiological stress effects in half of the subjects. Increased mental tension was correlated to increases as well as decreases of the blood pressure. Systolic blood pressure reactions were stronger than the reactions of diastolic blood pressure. Noise sensitive subjects reacted stronger than the others. In the short-term laboratory test, systolic blood pressure increases were smaller than the diastolic increases. At the end of the 5 minutes noise exposure only the diastolic blood pressure increases were significant. There was no correlation between the blood pressure reactions in the two different noise exposure experiments. There existed a positive correlation between noise sensitivity and the systolic blood pressure increases during the seminar, whilst the correlation, between noise sensitivity and systolic blood pressure increases in the laboratory exposure, was negative. From these results we conclude that short-term noise exposure experiments do not provide information about the effects of long-term real life exposure to environmental noise. Potential health effects of chronic noise-induced disturbances of activities are discussed.
对42名男性在研讨会上因噪声引起的交流干扰反应进行了调查。比较了有或无道路交通噪声(Lm = 60分贝)时的应激反应。在研讨室的一天中,通过扬声器播放交通噪声。测量了以下参数:通过问卷调查评估疲劳和精神紧张程度;测量血压和心率;检测收集尿液中肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和环磷酸腺苷的排泄量。相同的受试者参与了一项实验室测试,在休息5分钟以及暴露于间歇性白噪声(Lm = 97分贝)5分钟后测量血压。结果发现,现场实验中的噪声在一半受试者中引起了心理和生理应激效应。精神紧张程度的增加与血压的升高和降低均相关。收缩压反应比舒张压反应更强。对噪声敏感的受试者反应比其他人更强。在短期实验室测试中,收缩压的升高小于舒张压的升高。在5分钟噪声暴露结束时,只有舒张压的升高具有显著性。两种不同噪声暴露实验中的血压反应之间没有相关性。在研讨会上,噪声敏感性与收缩压升高之间存在正相关,而在实验室暴露中,噪声敏感性与收缩压升高之间的相关性为负。从这些结果我们得出结论,短期噪声暴露实验无法提供有关长期实际生活中暴露于环境噪声影响的信息。讨论了慢性噪声引起的活动干扰对健康的潜在影响。