Goerres G W, Schmid D T, Eyrich G K
Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 Nov;32(6):365-71. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/77741718.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of (68)Ge-based and CT-based attenuation correction as well as two standard image reconstruction algorithms on the appearance of artefacts due to dental hardware. Additionally, the intensity of such artefacts was compared with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in patients with known oral cavity squamous cell cancer.
Thirty-two metallic and non-metallic objects used for dentistry/dental surgery were scanned in a water-bath filled with FDG on a combined PET/CT scanner. Images were reconstructed with either CT-based or (68)Ge-based transmission data and by using iterative reconstruction or filtered backprojection. The intensity of artefacts was assessed visually using a subjective scale from 0 (no artefact visible) to 4 (very strong artefact), and by quantitative measurements. In a second study, images of 30 patients with known squamous cell cancer and dental hardware were retrospectively analysed by two observers, again using a visual assessment grading system. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical comparisons.
Eighteen of 32 objects caused artefacts, which were visible with both attenuation correction methods. CT-based attenuation correction was visually more intense than (68)Ge-based attenuation correction (P<0.0001), and the measured (18)F concentration was also higher (P=0.0002). No difference was found between the reconstruction algorithms. In 28 of 30 patients the primary tumour was visible. FDG uptake in the primary tumour was significantly higher than measured (18)F concentration in artefacts (P<0.0001).
Attenuation correction of PET images generates artefacts adjacent to dental hardware that mimic FDG uptake. In this series, the primary lesion was discriminated from artefacts.
本研究旨在评估基于(68)锗和基于CT的衰减校正以及两种标准图像重建算法对牙科硬件所致伪影表现的影响。此外,还将此类伪影的强度与已知口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)摄取情况进行了比较。
在一台PET/CT联合扫描仪上,将32个用于牙科/牙科手术的金属和非金属物体置于装有FDG的水浴中进行扫描。使用基于CT或基于(68)锗的透射数据,并通过迭代重建或滤波反投影来重建图像。使用从0(无可见伪影)到4(非常强烈的伪影)的主观量表对伪影强度进行视觉评估,并进行定量测量。在第二项研究中,由两名观察者对30例已知鳞状细胞癌且有牙科硬件的患者的图像进行回顾性分析,同样使用视觉评估分级系统。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计比较。
32个物体中有18个导致了伪影,两种衰减校正方法均可见这些伪影。基于CT的衰减校正视觉上比基于(68)锗的衰减校正更强烈(P<0.0001),且测量的(18)F浓度也更高(P=0.0002)。重建算法之间未发现差异。30例患者中有28例可见原发肿瘤。原发肿瘤中的FDG摄取显著高于伪影中测量的(18)F浓度(P<0.0001)。
PET图像的衰减校正会在牙科硬件附近产生类似FDG摄取的伪影。在本系列研究中,原发病变与伪影得以区分。