Yamada Hiroshi, Matsumoto Naoyuki, Kimura Minoru
Department of Physiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
J Neurosci. 2004 Apr 7;24(14):3500-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0068-04.2004.
To achieve a goal, animals procure immediately available rewards, escape from aversive events, or endure the absence of rewards. The neuronal substrates for these goal-directed actions include the limbic system and the basal ganglia. In the striatum, tonically active neurons (TANs), presumed cholinergic interneurons, were originally shown to respond to reward-associated stimuli and to evolve their activity through learning. Subsequent studies revealed that they also respond to aversive event-associated stimuli such as an airpuff on the face and that they are less selective to whether the stimuli instruct reward or no reward. To address this paradox, we designed a set of experiments in which macaque monkeys performed a set of visual reaction time tasks while expecting a reward, during escape from an aversive event, and in the absence of a reward. We found that TANs respond to instruction stimuli associated with motivational outcomes (312 of 390; 80%) but not to unassociated ones (51 of 390; 13%), and that they mostly differentiate associated instructions (217 of 312; 70%). We also found that a higher percentage of TANs in the caudate nucleus respond to stimuli associated with motivational outcomes (118 of 128; 92%) than in the putamen (194 of 262; 74%), whereas a higher percentage of TANs in the putamen respond to go signals for the lever release (112 of 262; 43%) than in the caudate nucleus (27 of 128; 21%), especially for an action expecting a reward. These findings suggest a distinct, pivotal role of TANs in the caudate nucleus and putamen in encoding instructed motivational contexts for goal-directed action planning and learning.
为了实现目标,动物会获取即时可得的奖励、逃离厌恶事件或忍受奖励缺失。这些目标导向行为的神经基质包括边缘系统和基底神经节。在纹状体中,原本被认为是胆碱能中间神经元的紧张性活动神经元(TANs)最初被证明对奖励相关刺激有反应,并通过学习改变其活动。随后的研究表明,它们也对厌恶事件相关刺激(如面部吹气)有反应,并且对刺激是指示奖励还是无奖励的选择性较低。为了解决这一矛盾,我们设计了一组实验,让猕猴在期待奖励时、逃离厌恶事件期间以及无奖励时执行一系列视觉反应时间任务。我们发现,TANs对与动机结果相关的指示刺激有反应(390个中有312个;80%),而对不相关的刺激没有反应(390个中有51个;13%),并且它们大多能区分相关指示(312个中有217个;70%)。我们还发现,尾状核中对与动机结果相关刺激有反应的TANs百分比(128个中有118个;92%)高于壳核(262个中有194个;74%),而壳核中对杠杆释放的执行信号有反应的TANs百分比(262个中有112个;43%)高于尾状核(128个中有27个;21%),尤其是对于期待奖励的动作。这些发现表明,尾状核和壳核中的TANs在为目标导向的动作规划和学习编码指示的动机背景方面具有独特的关键作用。