• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寄养儿童的安全与稳定:政策背景。

Safety and stability for foster children: the policy context.

作者信息

Allen MaryLee, Bissell Mary

出版信息

Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):48-73.

PMID:15072018
Abstract

Even though federal laws have had a major influence on foster care and child welfare policy for more than 40 years, additional reforms are needed to ensure safe and stable families for children in care. This article describes the complex array of policies that shape federal foster care and observes: A number of federal policies addressing issues such as housing, health care, welfare, social security benefits, taxes, and foster care reimbursement to the states, form the federal foster care policy framework. The Adoption and Safe Families Act significantly altered federal foster care policy by instituting key changes such as defining when it is reasonable to pursue family reunification, expediting timelines for making permanency decisions, recognizing kinship care as a permanency option, and providing incentives to the state for increasing the number of adoptions. Courts play a key and often overlooked role in achieving safety and permanency for children in foster care. Efforts to improve court performance have focused on increasing the responsiveness and capacity of courts. The article concludes with policy recommendations that are needed to improve the lives of children in foster care, such as increasing investments in children and families, redirecting funding incentives, addressing service gaps, and enhancing accountability.

摘要

尽管联邦法律在40多年来对寄养照料和儿童福利政策产生了重大影响,但仍需要进一步改革,以确保受照料儿童拥有安全稳定的家庭。本文描述了构成联邦寄养照料政策的一系列复杂政策,并指出:一些涉及住房、医疗保健、福利、社会保障福利、税收以及向各州提供寄养照料报销等问题的联邦政策,构成了联邦寄养照料政策框架。《收养与安全家庭法》通过实施关键变革,如界定何时追求家庭团聚是合理的、加快做出永久性安置决定的时间表、承认亲属照料为一种永久性安置选择,以及向各州提供增加收养数量的激励措施,显著改变了联邦寄养照料政策。法院在为寄养儿童实现安全和永久性安置方面发挥着关键且常被忽视的作用。改善法院工作表现的努力集中在提高法院的响应能力和办案能力上。文章最后提出了改善寄养儿童生活所需的政策建议,如增加对儿童和家庭的投资、重新调整资金激励措施、解决服务差距以及加强问责制。

相似文献

1
Safety and stability for foster children: the policy context.寄养儿童的安全与稳定:政策背景。
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):48-73.
2
Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification.美国州级以刑事司法为重点的产前物质使用政策与物质使用相关的寄养照料入院和家庭团聚之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Aug 1;174(8):782-788. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1027.
3
Permanency planning in the context of parental incarceration: legal issues and recommendations.父母监禁背景下的永久性安置规划:法律问题与建议
Child Welfare. 1998 Sep-Oct;77(5):543-59.
4
Interjurisdictional placement of children in foster care.跨辖区安置儿童进入寄养照护体系。
Child Welfare. 2004 Jan-Feb;83(1):5-26.
5
Family reunification.家庭团聚。
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):94-113.
6
Foster care and adoption policy in Romania: suggestions for international intervention.罗马尼亚的寄养与收养政策:国际干预建议
Child Welfare. 1993 Sep-Oct;72(5):489-506.
7
Children, families, and foster care: analysis and recommendations.儿童、家庭与寄养照护:分析与建议
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):4-29.
8
The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997: changing child welfare policy without addressing parental substance abuse.1997年的《收养与安全家庭法案》:在未解决父母药物滥用问题的情况下改变儿童福利政策。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1999 Winter;16(1):243-71.
9
A profile of post-ASFA hearings in the U.S. Congress.美国国会美国太空部队协会(ASFA)听证会之后的概况。
Child Welfare. 2013;92(1):65-88.
10
Policy and practice for response to foster families when child abuse or neglect is reported.当报告发生虐待或忽视儿童情况时,针对寄养家庭的应对政策与实践。
Child Welfare. 1992 Nov-Dec;71(6):497-509.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Shaping Intent to Access Services for Adolescents in Protective Custody.共同决策在塑造被保护性拘留青少年获取服务意愿方面的作用。
Child Care Pract. 2019;25(1):64-78. doi: 10.1080/13575279.2018.1521379. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Parenting Attitudes, Family Environments, Depression, and Anxiety in Caregivers of Maltreated Children.受虐儿童照料者的养育态度、家庭环境、抑郁和焦虑
Fam Relat. 2011 Jul;60(3):259-271. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00646.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
Assessing Restrictiveness: A Closer Look at the Foster Care Placements and Perceptions of Youth With and Without Disabilities Aging Out of Care.
评估限制性:深入研究寄养安置以及有残疾和无残疾的青少年在寄养结束后的看法。
J Public Child Welf. 2013;7(5):586-609. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2013.845644.
4
Do Maltreated Children who Remain at Home Function Better than Those who Are Placed?留在原生家庭的受虐儿童比被安置到其他家庭的儿童表现更好吗?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010 Dec;32(12):1675-1682. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.07.010.