Suppr超能文献

自动调压持续气道正压通气(CPAP)与固定压力CPAP治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气的随机试验

A randomized trial of auto-titrating CPAP and fixed CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea.

作者信息

Hussain Syed F, Love Leslie, Burt Heather, Fleetham John A

机构信息

Section of Pulmonary Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2004 Apr;98(4):330-3. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea (OSAH). Auto-titrating CPAP (APAP) devices automatically adjust pressure and may improve treatment compliance compared to fixed CPAP (F-CPAP).

METHODS

Randomized, prospective, single-blind, crossover trial to compare efficacy, side effects, compliance, patient satisfaction and preference between APAP and F-CPAP therapy in patients with moderate to severe OSAH. There were two treatment periods of 4 weeks each (APAP and F-CPAP), separated by a 2-week washout period.

RESULTS

Ten CPAP-naive OSAH patients (9 males) completed the study. They had Mean +/- SD age of 44.9 +/- 9.7 years; body mass index of 35.9 +/- 12.9 kg/m2 and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 47.2 +/- 35.6. Both forms of therapy were equally effective in improving the symptoms and in reducing the AHI. Both forms of therapy were associated with frequent side effects and had similar patient compliance. At the end of the study, more patients (6-1) preferred F-CPAP to A-CPAP therapy.

CONCLUSION

A-PAP was as effective as F-CPAP in the treatment of OSAH but was not associated with fewer side effects, better compliance, better satisfaction or increased patient preference.

摘要

背景

持续气道正压通气(CPAP)仍然是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气(OSAH)的首选治疗方法。与固定CPAP(F-CPAP)相比,自动调压CPAP(APAP)设备可自动调节压力,并可能提高治疗依从性。

方法

进行随机、前瞻性、单盲、交叉试验,以比较APAP和F-CPAP治疗中度至重度OSAH患者的疗效、副作用、依从性、患者满意度和偏好。有两个为期4周的治疗期(APAP和F-CPAP),中间间隔2周的洗脱期。

结果

10例初用CPAP的OSAH患者(9例男性)完成了研究。他们的平均年龄±标准差为44.9±9.7岁;体重指数为35.9±12.9kg/m²,呼吸暂停/低通气指数(AHI)为47.2±35.6。两种治疗方式在改善症状和降低AHI方面同样有效。两种治疗方式都伴有频繁的副作用,且患者依从性相似。在研究结束时,更多患者(6比1)更喜欢F-CPAP而非A-CPAP治疗。

结论

A-PAP在治疗OSAH方面与F-CPAP一样有效,但副作用并未减少,依从性、满意度未提高,患者偏好也未增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验