Suppr超能文献

自动调压气道正压通气:工程与医学之间的微妙界限

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

作者信息

Messineo Ludovico, White David P, Hete Bernard, Knepper Michael, Berry Richard, Noah William H

机构信息

Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.

Sleep Centers of Middle Tennessee, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2025 Jul 28;29(4):253. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03409-w.

Abstract

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.

摘要

自动调压气道正压通气(APAP)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)不同,它能根据从派生流量信号中自动检测到的事件动态调整治疗压力。APAP于20世纪90年代推出,迅速成为睡眠诊所的关键工具,最初它是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者手动滴定的更快替代方法,后来也作为加快随访的长期治疗选择。在依从性、疗效和症状控制方面,APAP和CPAP总体相当。然而,人们仍然担心APAP对慢性健康结果(如血压、肾功能和血糖值)的控制较差。与APAP相关的其他挑战涉及工程方面。一个主要问题是,APAP算法(用于控制事件检测/识别和压力调整)是各制造商专有的,且因制造商而异,这使得临床医生对其了解甚少。此外,与手动滴定或人工评分的多导睡眠图相比,APAP算法并不总是匹配得很好,尤其是在存在无意泄漏的情况下。设备之间事件检测、泄漏补偿和压力调整算法的差异给临床决策增加了另一层复杂性。所有这些都使OSA患者的管理变得复杂,这些患者可能会有大量残留的呼吸紊乱、高泄漏和宽压力范围。本综述旨在弥合APAP临床和工程观点之间的差距,提供最新的知识概述以及睡眠临床医生在使用PAP疗法管理OSA患者时应考虑的现有挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ba/12304072/0377f89bebb7/11325_2025_3409_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验