Suppr超能文献

小儿创伤的应急管理需要一个完整的团队吗?

Is a full team required for emergency management of pediatric trauma?

作者信息

Singh R, Kissoon N, Singh N, Girotti M, Lane P

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Emergency, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1992 Aug;33(2):213-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199208000-00008.

Abstract

Pediatric trauma centers often do not meet the guidelines requiring a trauma team as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We reviewed our experience with a team consisting of a pediatric emergency physician, resident, nurse, and respiratory therapist. The surgical and pediatric critical care residents and staff were available within 5 minutes. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 146 patients (aged 8.1 +/- 4.8 years) between 1987 and 1989, with Injury Severity Scores (ISS) greater than or equal to 16 or admitted to the pediatric critical care unit. The time of presentation, surgical services consulted, and the nature of the injury were obtained from chart review. The Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) were used to determine the severity of insult and physiologic derangement on admission. The Modified Injury Severity Score (MISS) was determined and the Delta score for Disability Assessment was assigned at discharge. The Delta score was also determined at 3-month intervals up to one year. The probability of survival (Ps) was calculated, using the ISS and RTS. The Z statistic for this group of patients was then determined, using the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) methodology. The percentages of patients who were normal, disabled, and dead were 61%, 31.5%, and 7.5%, respectively, at 6 months follow-up. Eleven deaths were expected based on PRISM and TRISS analysis. Our mortality and morbidity figures were comparable with those of centers with teams based on AAP guidelines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

儿科创伤中心常常不符合美国儿科学会(AAP)所推荐的配备创伤团队的指导方针。我们回顾了由一名儿科急诊医生、住院医师、护士和呼吸治疗师组成的团队的经验。外科和儿科重症监护住院医师及工作人员能在5分钟内到达。我们对1987年至1989年间146例患者(年龄8.1±4.8岁)进行了回顾性病历审查,这些患者的损伤严重度评分(ISS)大于或等于16分,或被收入儿科重症监护病房。从病历审查中获取就诊时间、咨询的外科服务以及损伤性质。使用儿科创伤评分(PTS)、修订创伤评分(RTS)、损伤严重度评分(ISS)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分和儿科死亡风险(PRISM)来确定入院时损伤的严重程度和生理紊乱情况。确定改良损伤严重度评分(MISS),并在出院时分配残疾评估的Delta评分。在长达一年的时间里,每隔3个月也确定一次Delta评分。使用ISS和RTS计算生存概率(Ps)。然后使用重大创伤结果研究(MTOS)方法确定该组患者的Z统计量。在6个月随访时,正常、残疾和死亡患者的百分比分别为61%、31.5%和7.5%。根据PRISM和TRISS分析,预计有11例死亡。我们的死亡率和发病率数据与遵循AAP指南配备团队的中心的数据相当。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验