Hall J R, Reyes H M, Meller J L, Loeff D S, Dembek R
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jan;31(1):72-6; discussion 76-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90322-x.
The mortality rate for pediatric trauma patients cared for in adult trauma centers has been shown, by means of TRISS methodology, not to differ significantly from that of the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS). The question remains, however, whether the outcome of injured children is better in a designated pediatric trauma center (DPTC). The authors' hypothesis is that outcome is better at a DPTC.
The records of 1,797 children (0 to 15 years of age) admitted to a DPTC between 1987 and 1993 were reviewed. TRISS methodology was used to calculate probability of survival for outcome comparison with the MTOS. The data also was compared with outcome in relation to the admitting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) reported in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR).
The outcome of all children at this DPTC had a Z score of +1.4199 (P > .1). The Z score of children admitted because of penetrating trauma (PT, n = 460) did not differ significantly from that of the MTOS. However, the children admitted because of blunt trauma (BT, n = 1,337) had a Z score of +3.3501 (M score = .90), which is significantly better than that of the MTOS (P < .001). The BT population with an ISS of > or = 9 (n = 149) had a Z score of +2.8686 (P < .005) (M = .95). By GCS comparison, the BT group had a outcome similar to that reported in the NPTR. Head injury was the cause of death for 26 (84%) of the 31 PT deaths and 20 (83%) of the 24 BT deaths (three of the remaining four had associated severe head injury). Only 1 of 24 (4%) BT liver injuries and 5 (21%) of 24 BT splenic injuries required surgical intervention. This low incidence of liver and splenic surgical invention is similar to that reported by other DPTCs, but for children treated at adult centers the rates are 37% to 58% and 43% to 53% for liver & splenic surgical intervention, respectively.
Children with BT have a significantly better outcome at a DPTC; the outcome for children with PT does not differ. Successful nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal injuries is more likely to occur at a DPTC than at adult trauma centers "with pediatric committment." Thus, children with blunt injuries should be taken to a DPTC, when available.
通过创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法显示,在成人创伤中心接受治疗的儿科创伤患者的死亡率与重大创伤结局研究(MTOS)的死亡率相比,无显著差异。然而,问题依然存在,即在指定的儿科创伤中心(DPTC)受伤儿童的结局是否更好。作者的假设是,在DPTC结局更好。
回顾了1987年至1993年间收治于一家DPTC的1797例儿童(0至15岁)的记录。采用TRISS方法计算生存概率,以便与MTOS进行结局比较。数据还与国家儿科创伤登记处(NPTR)报告的与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)相关的结局进行了比较。
该DPTC所有儿童的结局Z评分为+1.4199(P>.1)。因穿透性创伤(PT,n = 460)入院的儿童的Z评分与MTOS无显著差异。然而,因钝性创伤(BT,n = 1337)入院的儿童的Z评分为+3.3501(M评分=.90),显著优于MTOS(P<.001)。损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥9的BT患者群体(n = 149)的Z评分为+2.8686(P<.005)(M =.95)。通过GCS比较,BT组的结局与NPTR报告的相似。头部损伤是31例PT死亡中的26例(84%)和24例BT死亡中的20例(83%)的死亡原因(其余4例中有3例伴有严重头部损伤)。24例BT肝损伤中仅1例(4%)和24例BT脾损伤中5例(21%)需要手术干预。肝脾手术干预的低发生率与其他DPTC报告的相似,但对于在成人中心接受治疗的儿童,肝脾手术干预的发生率分别为37%至58%和43%至53%。
BT儿童在DPTC的结局显著更好;PT儿童的结局无差异。与“有儿科服务承诺”的成人创伤中心相比,在DPTC更有可能成功地对钝性腹部损伤进行非手术治疗。因此,如有条件,钝性损伤儿童应被送往DPTC。